Abstract:Mingjie Huang, Shuanghu Fang School of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Shuanghu Fang, Email Introduction: Because the mechanisms by which moral elevation triggers an individual's pro-social behavior remain unclear, this study examined the mediating role of self-control resources in the relationship between moral elevation and pro-social behavior. Methods: Experiment 1 examined the effects of moral elevation on self-control resources using two task paradigms, the Stroop task and the Go/NoGo task, with 80 college students as study participants. Experiment 2 was conducted with an additional 140 college students, using both experimental and questionnaire methods to examine the mediating role of self-control resources in the effects of moral elevation on pro-social behavior. Results: (1) The results of Experiment 1 showed that the self-control ability of the moral elevation induction group was significantly better than that of the non-induction group. The accuracy rate of self-control tasks in the induction group (0.94 ± 0.01) was significantly higher than that in the non-induction group (0.89 ± 0.01, F (1,79) =19.10, p < 0.001, η 2 =0.50). The mean reaction time of the self-control tasks in the induction group (393.63 ± 3.5) was significantly lower than that in the non-induction group (415.38 ± 7.30, F (1,79) =5.87, p =0.026, η 2 =0.24). (2) The results of Experiment 2 showed a significant positive correlation between moral elevation and self-control resources (r=0.46, p< 0.001), a significant positive correlation between moral elevation and pro-social behavior (r=0.33, p< 0.001), and a significant positive correlation between self-control resources and pro-social behavior (r=0.31, p< 0.001). Not only did moral elevation significantly and positively predict pro-social behavior (β= 0.23, p=0.011), but it also significantly and positively predicted self-control resources (β= 0.46, p< 0.001). Self-control resources significantly and positively predicted pro-social behavior (β= 0.20, p=0.025). The bootstrap test for the mediating effect of self-control resources showed that the upper and lower limits of the 95% confidence interval did not include 0 (indirect effect 0.09, 95% CI [0.023, 0.242], p< 0.001), and the mediating effect accounted for 28.13%. Conclusion: This study revealed the mediating role of self-control resources in the relationship between moral elevation and pro-social behavior, which has important theoretical and practical implications for cultivating pro-social behavior and moral education among college students. Keywords: pro-social behavior, moral elevation, self-control, mediating role, college students Pro-social behavior is an individual's behavior and trend of helping, cooperating, sharing, comforting, etc., in social interaction conducive to others and social harmony 1 and is an important aspect of individual social development. The implementation of pro-social behaviors can enhance the psychological well-being of the initiator of the behavior, 2 subjective well-being, 3 interpersonal relationships, 4 the acquisition of fame and social status, 5 and more prominent personal achievements. 6 Therefore, considering the important role of pro-social behavior in personal development and social harmony, and to cultivate the pro-social behavior of college students better, it is necessary to explore the influencing factors and mechanisms of pro-social behavior. Human pro-social behavior and its systematic evolution and development are major scientific issues of great concern to the scientific community. 7 Researchers have long been committed to revealing the origin and development mechanism of human pro-social behavior from social and cultural factors as well as personal factors. 7,8 In recent years, many prosocial studies have consistently shown that moral development, emotion, social cognition, and other factors jointly affect pro-social behavior. 9 When looking for the factors that affect college students' pro-social behavior level, many researchers have favoured moral emotion. Researchers believe that moral emotions such as gratitude, 10 admiration, 11 guilt 12 and shame 13 have played an important role. In addition, Fredrickson 14 broadens and builds a theory of positive emotions suggesting that positive emotions can establish personal resources, social resources, etc., and promote the recovery of personal physical and mental resources. These practical and theoretical studies show that positive moral emot -Abstract Truncated-

Moral Self-Appraisals Explain Emotional Rewards of Prosocial Behavior

Symbolic Moral Self-Completion – Social Recognition of Prosocial Behavior Reduces Subsequent Moral Striving

Moral Positive Illusion: Self–other Valuation Difference in Moral Foundation Theory

What Accounts for Prosocial Behavior? Roles of Moral Identity, Moral Judgment, and Self-Efficacy Beliefs

Association between moral cognition, moral emotion and prosocial behavior: Evidence from meta-analysis

Mechanisms of Self-Control in the Influence of Moral Elevation on Pro-Social Behavior: A Study Based on an Experimental Paradigm

Different Path to Happiness: The Role of Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction in Benefiting Close and Distant Others

The promotive influence of positive moral emotions on prosocial behavior in 3–5‐year‐old children

Anticipated affect predicts moral praise and character judgments.

Moral identity, moral self-efficacy, and moral elevation: A sequential mediation model predicting moral intentions and behaviour

Asymmetrical effects of reward and punishment on attributions of morality

Moral identity in relation to emotional well-being: a meta-analysis

Aesthetic Motivation Impacts Judgments of Others’ Prosociality and Mental Life

Positive impacts of perceived social support on prosocial behavior: the chain mediating role of moral identity and moral sensitivity

The sociocultural appraisals, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality: core processes from gene to meme

To be (or not to be) elevated? Group membership, moral models, and prosocial behavior

Social-emotional need satisfaction, prosocial motivation, and students’ positive behavioral and well-being outcomes

Doing good vs. avoiding bad in prosocial choice: A refined test and extension of the morality preference hypothesis

The relations among prosocial behavior, hedonic, and eudaimonic well‐being in everyday life

The Moral Identity Questionnaire predicts prosocial behavior better than the Moral Identity Scale

Is Doing Good Good Enough? A Motivation, Action, Sacrifice, and Temptation (MAST) View of Moral Praiseworthiness