Abstract:The purpose of the article. Considering the growing expansion of man in relation to nature, we should include the support (or violation) of the biosphere’s ability to self-reproduction as one of the most important criteria in all classifications and typologies of landscapes, ecosystems, geosystems, types of human activity. The main material. We implement this general criterion at the level of ecosystems of different species and spatial levels. Thus, we theoretically approach to the selection of anthropogenic landscapes (including linear ones), considering the priorities of ecosystem dynamics. The problem indicated in the title is primarily the result of constant density growth of the transport network, and, therefore, the ever-increasing “theft” of natural ecosystems by humans from aboriginal plants and animals. The main feature of the study in highly developed countries is the priority of preserving ecosystem dynamics during the construction and operation of highways. The solution to this problem, for example, in the USA today, is in the development of a practical guide for companies engaged in road construction. Based on such priorities, we should pay attention to the following quantitative and qualitative parameters of road landscapes that can affect the dynamics of infra-ecosystems: the species composition of plant communities, which can be an indicator of individual impacts of roads. For example, the presence of halophyte plants will help to fight against icing with salts or insufficient soil washing regime. The presence of invasive plants affects the intensity of the transfer of their seeds by vehicles or birds; the presence of hydrophyte plants, which may indicate insufficient drainage of the road surface, etc. External manifestations of the vital activity of animals on the roadside territories can help to assess the completeness of ecosystem relations in infra-ecosystems, signs of disruption of ecosystem dynamics by the road surface. In our opinion, the concept of noospheric ecosystems, of which infra-ecosystems (or road) are a part, can satisfy the indicated requirements for the highway monitoring research program. Road landscapes are an integral part of the transport infrastructure, from which the name “infra-ecosystem” actually originates. However, we consider natural (natural, natural-anthropogenic) processes in landscape-engineering and landscape-technogenic systems that are fully controlled by humans, as common features that determine road landscapes. They are extremely important for our research, as these systems are not capable of independent development, but manifest it only in their individual components. For example, artificially planted shrubs, trees, or sown grasses along the road surface are supplemented with plants characteristic of this natural zone over time, forming even certain plant groups. Conclusions. Monitoring research programs should answer the following main questions: How do the infraecosystems differ from the natural ecosystems of the area? In particular, assessment of all (or some types of impact): soil composition, hydrological regime, phyto- and zoo diversity, dustiness, noise pollution, radiation background, etc. How has this infraecosystem adapted to the conditions of anthropogenic impact (changes in the species composition of plants and animals, the formation of new trophic relationships, etc.)? What needs to be done to minimize the negative impact of transport activities on the new ecosystem, environmentally adapted infrastructure.

Monitoring research and care for nature technologies in biosphere reserves UNESCO

Nature reserves (zapovedniks) in the Volga catchment: protection, research and management

Methods for Monitoring Large Terrestrial Animals in the Wild

The Role of Biodiversity in the Functioning of Ecosystems: Paper 1. General Principles of Monitoring Ecosystems

Landscape research: from paradigm through GIS technology to monitoring (on the example of the territory of the Slobozhansky National Nature Park)

MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT OF THE RIVER’S ECOLOGICAL STATE METHODOLOGY USING INTEGRAL BIOMARKERS AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT METHODS

Prospects and main aspects of the GIS-technologies application for monitoring of biodiversity (on the example of the Chornobyl Radiation-Ecological Biosphere Reserve)

Disturbed land restoration in mountain ecosystems

Development of a matrix of landscape restoration measures in the basin of the transboundary Ural River

Recovery of Velykyi Luh through ecological restoration of the Kakhovka Reservoir

The role of biodiversity in ensuring the functioning of ecosystems. Message2. Small mammals in the ecological monitoring system: data obtaining, assessment of diversity, state and dynamics of ecosystems

Conceptual framework for the management of conservation sites

Information Support of Monitoring as a Tool of Ecological Optimization of Agricultural Land Use

Use of basic hydrochemical and hydrobiological indicators to determine the invariant state of the Kuibyshev reservoir and its tributaries

Nature-Based Solutions in Spatial Planning: How to Adapt Land Use to Natural Heterogeneity in Agroforest Landscapes in Russia

Spatial-temporal Transformation of the Volga Reservoirs’ Soil Complex. Communication 7. Sediment Formation in the Highly Running Reservoirs of the Volga Cascade

Creation of specially protected natural territories as a factor of sustainable development of the territory

Strategic Planning of Methods for Monitoring and Assessing the Ecological State of Water Bodies

The concept of noospheric ecosystems as the theoretical basis for monitoring studies of roadside landscapes

[Overview on Habitat Monitoring Methods Under Watershed Ecological Space Management]

Monitoring and management of high-end tourism in protected areas based on 3D sensor image collection