Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Aim</h3><p>Nutrient enrichment is associated with plant invasions and biodiversity loss. Functional trait advantages may predict the ascendancy of invasive plants following nutrient enrichment but this is rarely tested. Here, we investigate (a) whether dominant native and non‐native plants differ in important morphological and physiological leaf traits, (b) how their traits respond to nutrient addition, and (c) whether responses are consistent across functional groups.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Location</h3><p>Australia, Europe, North America and South Africa.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Time period</h3><p>2007–2014.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Major taxa studied</h3><p>Graminoids and forbs.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>We focused on two types of leaf traits connected to resource acquisition: morphological features relating to light‐foraging surfaces and investment in tissue (specific leaf area, SLA) and physiological features relating to internal leaf chemistry as the basis for producing and utilizing photosynthate. We measured these traits on 503 leaves from 151 dominant species across 27 grasslands on four continents. We used an identical nutrient addition treatment of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) at all sites. Sites represented a broad range of grasslands that varied widely in climatic and edaphic conditions.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>We found evidence that non‐native graminoids invest in leaves with higher nutrient concentrations than native graminoids, particularly at sites where native and non‐native species both dominate. We found little evidence that native and non‐native forbs differed in the measured leaf traits. These results were consistent in natural soil fertility levels and nutrient‐enriched conditions, with dominant species responding similarly to nutrient addition regardless of whether they were native or non‐native.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Main conclusions</h3><p>Our work identifies the inherent physiological trait advantages that can be used to predict non‐native graminoid establishment, potentially because of higher efficiency at taking up crucial nutrients into their leaves. Most importantly, these inherent advantages are already present at natural soil fertility levels and are maintained following nutrient enrichment.</p></section>

Superior performance of invasive grasses over native counterparts will remain problematic under warmer and drier conditions

Invasion success of three cool‐season grasses in the northern prairie: a test of three hypotheses

An invasive grass shows colonization advantages over native grasses under conditions of low resource availability

Invasive annual grass interacts with drought to influence plant communities and soil moisture in dryland restoration

The invasion of plant communities following extreme weather events under ambient and elevated temperature

Nonindigenous Plant Advantage in Native and Exotic Australian Grasses under Experimental Drought, Warming, and Atmospheric CO2 Enrichment

Invasive forb benefits from water savings by native plants and carbon fertilization under elevated CO2 and warming.

Differences in growth-economics of fast vs. slow growing grass species in response to temperature and nitrogen limitation individually, and in combination

Tolerance to drought and flooding events provides a competitive advantage for an invasive over a native plant species

Nitrogen addition, not heterogeneity, alters the relationship between invasion and native decline in California grasslands

Nitrogen Uptake and Use Efficiency of Invasive Spartina Alterniflora and Native Phragmites Australis: Effect of Nitrogen Supply

Integrating experiments and monitoring reveals extreme sensitivity of invasive winter annuals to precipitation

Native woody legumes respond more negatively to extreme drought than invasive ones

Dominant native and non‐native graminoids differ in key leaf traits irrespective of nutrient availability

Invasive annual grasses destabilize plant communities in a northern mixed‐grass prairie

Invasive plants have greater growth than co‐occurring natives in live soil subjected to a drought‐rewetting treatment

Effects of experimental climate warming and associated soil drought on the competition between three highly invasive West European alien plant species and native counterparts

Scaling up experimental stress responses of grass invasion to predictions of continental‐level range suitability

Contrasting responses of naturalized alien and native plants to native soil biota and drought

Multigenerational invasive plant competition causes greater root than shoot trait shifts in a perennial grass

The Invasive Plant Amaranthus spinosus L. Exhibits a Stronger Resistance to Drought than the Native Plant A. tricolor L. under Co-Cultivation Conditions When Treated with Light Drought