Abstract:ESG information disclosure is an essential aspect of corporate ESG responsibility and has gained significant attention in the context of ecological civilization development within the socialist market economy. However, in China's early stage of ESG development, challenges such as ESG rating discrepancies, "greenwashing", and corporate "cleansing" accompany ESG information disclosure. This study aims to investigate the impact of corporate ESG information disclosure on audit fees using a sample of non-financial A-share listed companies in China from 2011 to 2020. Drawing on the "deep pocket" theory, risk premium theory, and cost-benefit principle, the research examines the relationship between ESG information disclosure and audit fees. The findings reveal that approximately one-third of Chinese enterprises disclose ESG information, and substantial variation exists in the disclosure scores among the disclosed firms. The empirical analysis further demonstrates that firms disclosing ESG information tend to face higher audit fees, with higher ESG disclosure scores associated with increased audit fees. Moreover, an increase in the disclosure score of any ESG dimension (environment, social responsibility, and corporate governance) leads to higher audit fees. The study also identifies operational risk as a mediating factor in the relationship between ESG disclosure and audit fees. Additionally, media attention can dampen the positive effect of ESG disclosure scores on audit fees. Furthermore, the impact of ESG disclosure scores on audit fees is more pronounced in firms that voluntarily disclose ESG information before the implementation of the new Environmental Protection Law. These findings contribute to the literature and provide theoretical insights for governmental and regulatory decision-making, corporate managers, auditors, and ESG investors in China.

Investor protection and audit fees: evidence from the E-interaction platform in China

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Public Governance and Tunneling: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in China

Institutional Investors' Corporate Site Visits and Audit Fees: Evidence from China

Individual investors matter: The effect of investor-firm interactions on corporate earnings management

Impacts of the China Securities Investor Services Center's Shareholding Exercise on Audit Fees

The effect of environmental credit rating on audit fees: A quasi-natural experiment from China

Can High-Quality Interactions Reduce the Regulatory Inquiries Received by Firms? Evidence from Interactive Investor Platforms in China

Institutional investors’ distraction and audit fees: The mediating effect of ESG rating disagreement

Effects of Auditing Fee on Auditing Quality: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China

Do auditors care about what retail investors say? Evidence from China

The impact of ESG performance on audit fees - a study based on a two-way fixed effects model

Exploring the relationship between corporate ESG information disclosure and audit fees: evidence from non-financial A-share listed companies in China

ESG rating divergence and audit fees: Evidence from China

Investor–firm interactions and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China

Positive Externality of Analyst Coverage Upon Audit Services: Evidence from China

Impact of economic policy uncertainty on audit fees: Evidence from Chinese listed companies

Ultimate Rights and Audit Fee Payments: Evidence from China

Annual report inquiry letters, disclosure of key audit matters and audit fees: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies

Audit Fees, Auditor Switching and Audit Opinion Shopping:Test for Interaction Effect Based on Evidences of Chinese Stock Market

A study on the impact of the threat of exit from non-controlling shareholders on audit fees