Abstract:Personality and Social Psychology Review, Ahead of Print. Academic Despite increased popular and academic interest, there is conceptual ambiguity about what allyship is and the forms it takes. Viewing allyship as a practice, we introduce the typology of allyship action which organizes the diversity of ways that advantaged individuals seek to support those who are disadvantaged. We characterize allyship actions as reactive (addressing bias when it occurs) and proactive (fostering positive outcomes such as feelings of inclusion, respect, and capacity), both of which can vary in level of analysis (i.e., targeting oneself, one or a few other individuals, or institutions). We use this framework to profile six productive yet largely independent bodies of social psychological literature on social action and directly compare relative benefits and constraints of different actions. We suggest several future directions for empirical research, using the typology of allyship to understand when, where, and how different forms of allyship might succeed.Public Despite increased popular and academic interest in the word, people differ in what they believe allyship is and the forms it takes. Viewing allyship as a practice, we introduce a new way (the typology of allyship action) to describe how advantaged individuals seek to support those who are disadvantaged. We characterize allyship actions as reactive (addressing bias when it occurs) and proactive (increasing positive outcomes such as feelings of inclusion, respect, and capacity), both of which can vary in level (i.e., targeting oneself, one or a few other individuals, or institutions). We use this framework to profile six large yet mostly separate areas of social psychological research on social action and directly compare the relative benefits and limitations of different actions. We suggest several future directions for how the typology of allyship action can help us understand when, where, and how different forms of allyship might succeed.

Disadvantaged group members’ evaluations and support for allies: Investigating the role of communication style and group membership

How do disadvantaged groups perceive allies? Women's perceptions of men who confront sexism in an egalitarian or paternalistic way

(Absent) Allyship in STEM: Can Psychological Standing Increase Prejudice Confrontation?

Perceived social influence of allied men drives their ability to communicate respect to women in male-dominated fields

When People Do Allyship: A Typology of Allyship Action

The politics of allyship: Multiethnic coalitions and mass attitudes toward protest

"My Aim Is True": An Attribution-Identity Model of Ally Sincerity

Advancing Active Allyship for Social Justice: Cross-Group Friendships, Social Empathy, and Political Engagement

Broadening our sights: Expanding the consequences of allyship for allies

Does attitude importance moderate the effects of person-first language? A registered report

My Fight or Yours: Stereotypes of Activists From Advantaged and Disadvantaged Groups

When, why, and for whom is receiving help actually helpful? Differential effects of receiving empowering and nonempowering help based on recipient gender.

Getting by with a little help from my antiracist White friends: Can White antiracism counteract the demobilizing effect of positive contact?

Unraveling Image and Justice Concerns: A Social Identity Account on Appraisals and Emotional Drivers of High-Status Transgressor Group Members' Solidarity With Low-Status Groups

Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: the mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions

Perpetuating Inequality: Junior Women Do Not See Queen Bee Behavior as Negative but Are Nonetheless Negatively Affected by It

Hostility and Perceptions of Support in Ambiguous Social Interactions

How to be an effective ally

Do Members of Disadvantaged Groups Explain Group Status With Group Stereotypes?

When Social Support Fails: Supporter Characteristics in Compliance-Induced Attitude Change

Social Transmission of Leadership Preference: Knowledge of Group Membership and Partisan Media Reporting Moderates Perceptions of Leadership Ability From Facial Cues to Competence and Dominance