Abstract:Based on the philosophy of Martin Heidegger the article presents the possibility of actualizing Heidegger’s main question about the meaning of Being in the context of the analysis of so-called “a priori perfect.” During the development of fundamental ontology in the second half of the 1920s, Heidegger ponders the approach to Being in the history of philosophy and identifies such a feature of Being as a priori, a kind of antecedence of Being in relation to being. Although tradition invariably understands Being in this way, in it, according to Heidegger, the question is no longer raised either about the sense of such antecedence, or about the temporal basis of this sense, and therefore a priori as the essential character of Being is left in total oblivion. We suggest that it is the problematization of apriority in its temporal origin that can contribute to resolving Heidegger’s fundamental philosophical question of time as the transcendental horizon of any concept of Being that precedes being. In this precedence there is a cherished temporal moment, the comprehension of which allows us to develop the “basic question of metaphysics” about the relationship of Being and time in a more concrete way than Heidegger’s four main themes of the question of Being: the ontological difference; the basic articulation of Being (essentia/existentia)); the truth-character of Being; the possible modifications of Being and the unity of Being’s variety. Revealing a priori question as the central question of all Heideggers thinking before the “Turn” we attempt to update this question and justify the need for its renewal on the basis of a fundamental ontology. With this task we relate the question of the essence of philosophy in general in its existential-temporal concept since philosophy appears as a temporality-based possible of the questioning return to the “earlier”: to the essential structures of being, knowledge, Being, Dasein. Our analysis is based on the following decisions: (1) Being in relation to being is always pre-understood as “earlier,” and in this understanding a temporal definition operates, hence the main question of fundamental ontology about the relation of Being and time can be developed or at least clarified through the problem of meaning of a priori. (2) The question of the meaning of the “earlier” and of the temporal basis for understanding Being as “earlier,” a priori, is concretized into the question of the conditions for the possibility of any ontology, including the fundamental ontology, which raises the question of the earlier in relation to Being and therefore “lives” in the light of the understanding of the “earlier” as such. (3) This reflexive foundation of the fundamental ontology from itself is a necessary stage on the way of developing its project, if we remember that the main “duty” of the philosopher is to clarify “our inner nature” for the sake of opening the boundaries and conditions of the possibility of philosophy. The conclusion is that the possibilities of fundamental ontology in making sense of Being, time, and philosophy in general are far from exhausted, but await the questions that actualize them and new readings that allow to see the hidden richness of Heidegger’s thought.

The Thesis of Medieval Ontology in Heidegger’s Interpretation

Problematization and modification of phenomenological concept of experience in Martin Heidegger`s fundamental ontology

The Phenomenological-Ontological Dimension of Philosophy of History: the Problem of History in Husserl and Heidegger

The Buddhistical Causes (hetupratyaya) of Heidegger's Thought

Heidegger’s Existential Ontology and Its Reconstruction in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia

Some aspects of F. Brentano's ontology and its influence on the philosophy of M. Heidegger

Fundamental Ontology, Saturated Phenomena and Transcendental Dilemma

The Problem of Apoha in Hetu-vidyā from a Phenomenological Perspective

The distinctions of Heideggerian phenomenological research method

Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology and the Problem of Animal Life

The Overturning of Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology

The Problem of Meaning and Reference in Heidegger

Heideggerian hermeneutic phenomenology as method: modelling analysis through a meta-synthesis of articles on Being-towards-death

THE PROBLEM OF A PRIORI IN FUNDAMENTAL ONTOLOGY: A PRIORI PERFECT AND THE EXISTENTIAL-TEMPORAL CONCEPT OF PHILOSOPHY

Phenomenological understanding of technology by M. Heidegger (on the material of the article “The Question Concerning Technology”)

Towards fundamental ontology: Heidegger’s phenomenological reading of Kant

The Muslim philosophers and Heideggers the existing phenomenology

Heidegger's fundamental ontology and the human good in Aristotelian ethics

The Mathematical Discipline of Thought in the Light of Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology

Heidegger and Mindfulness Meditation: Making Peace With the Abyss

On the Difference Between Heidegger's Early Phenomenology and Husserl's Phenomenology