Abstract:Aim: To investigate the role of anal cushions in hemorrhoidectomy and its effect on anal continence of the patients. Methods: Seventy-six consecutive patients (33 men and 43 women) with a mean age of 44 years were included. They underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy because of symptomatic third- and fourth-degree hemorrhoids and failure in conservative treatment for years. Wexner score was recorded and liquid continence test was performed for each patient before and two months after operation using the techniques described in our previous work. The speed-constant rectal lavage apparatus was prepared in our laboratory. The device could output a pulsed and speed-constant saline stream with a high pressure, which is capable of overcoming any rectal resistance change. The patients were divided into three groups, group A (< 900 mL), group B (900-1200 mL) and group C (> 1200 mL) according to the results of the preoperative liquid continence test. Results: All the patients completed the study. The average number of hemorrhoidal masses excised was 2.4. Most patients presented with hemorrhoidal symptoms for more than one year, including a mean duration of incontinence of 5.2 years. The most common symptoms before surgery were anal bleeding (n = 55), prolapsed lesion (n = 34), anal pain (n = 12) and constipation (n = 17). There were grade III hemorrhoids in 39 (51.3%) patients, and grade IV in 37 (48.7%) patients according to Goligher classification. Five patients had experienced hemorrhoid surgery at least once. Compared with postoperative results, the retained volume in the preoperative liquid continence test was higher in 40 patients, lower in 27 patients, and similar in the other 9 patients. The overall preoperative retained volume in the liquid continence test was 1130.61 ± 78.35 mL, and postoperative volume was slightly decreased (991.27 ± 42.77 mL), but there was no significant difference (P = 0.057). Difference was significant in the test value before and after hemorrhoidectomy in group A (858.24 ± 32.01 mL vs 574.18 ± 60.28 mL, P = 0.011), but no obvious difference was noted in group B or group C. There was no significant difference in Wexner score before and after operation (1.68 ± 0.13 vs 2.10 ± 0.17, P = 0.064). By further stratified analysis, there was significant difference before and 2 months after operation in group A (2.71 ± 0.30 vs 3.58 ± 0.40, P = 0.003). In contrast, there were no significant differences in group B or group C (1.89 ± 0.15 vs 2.11 ± 0.19, P = 0.179; 0.98 ± 0.11 vs 1.34 ± 0.19, P = 0.123). Conclusion: There is no difference in the continence status of patients before and after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. However, patients with preoperative compromised continence may have further deterioration of their continence, hence Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy should be avoided in such patients.

Predictors of postoperative urinary retention after semiclosed hemorrhoidectomy

The Investigation of Risk Factors of Post-Polypectomy Emergency Hemorrhage

Factors that predict urinary retention in patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair

Urinary retention after operations for benign anorectal diseases

Postoperative urinary retention after surgery for benign anorectal disease: potential risk factors and strategy for prevention

What Are the Risk Factors Associated with Urinary Retention after Orthopaedic Surgery?

Postoperative urinary retention in general surgical patients

Lower Incidence of Postoperative Urinary Retention in Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Surgery

Preoperative urinary function does not predict postoperative acute urinary retention in men after rectal resection

Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention in patients underwent surgery for benign anorectal diseases: a nested case-control study

Effect of single spinal anesthesia with two doses ropivacaine on urinary retention after hemorrhoidectomy in male patients

Assessing the impact of spinal versus general anesthesia on postoperative urinary retention in elective spinal surgery patients

Do we still need to restrict preoperative fluid administration in ambulatory anorectal surgery under spinal anaesthesia?

Prevention of Severe Post-operative Urinary Retention after Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Technical Review and Five-patient Case Series

Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Literature and Meta-Analysis

Postoperative urinary retention after pelvic organ prolapse repair: Vaginal versus robotic transabdominal approach

Predictors of delayed postoperative urinary retention after female pelvic reconstructive surgery

Development and validation of a prediction model for postoperative urinary retention after prolapse surgery: A retrospective cohort study

Effects of early warm water sitz bath on urinary retention and pain after haemorrhoidectomy: A randomized controlled trial

Excisional hemorrhoidal surgery and its effect on anal continence

A prediction model for postoperative urinary retention after thoracic surgery