Abstract:This study investigated the comparative efficacy of two instructional approaches—didactic teaching and self-instructional training—in teaching average and poor readers a comprehension question-answering strategy. Forty-five average students and 45 poor readers from Grades 5 and 6 participated. These 38 girls and 52 boys were equally and randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: didactic teaching of the strategy, self-instruction, or control (no training). Students in the first two treatment conditions learned a mnemonic strategy (“Here,” “Hidden,” and “in my Head”) to indicate question-answer relationships that are text explicit, text implicit, or script implicit, respectively. Essentially, the 3H mnemonic cued students to use appropriate text and/or knowledge-base information in answering comprehension test questions. In addition, students in the self-instruction group learned three self-questions to guide their use of the 3H strategy. Specifically, the self-questions focused students' attention on the task, provided a basis for decision making concerning the categorization of comprehension test questions, and reminded students to check their answers. The results indicated that both didactic teaching and self-instructional training of the strategy effected significant improvements in students' reading comprehension performance. However, self-instructional training was more effective in enhancing and maintaining students' reading comprehension performance than didactic teaching. Moreover, results from the oral questionnaire indicated that the 3H strategy training increased students' general metacognitive knowledge. Lastly, of the 60 trained students, 52 wrote that they would encourage other children to leant the 3H strategy. Thus, the response to strategy learning was clearly positive.

Passage-Dependence of Items Designed to Measure the Ability to Identify the Main Ideas of Paragraphs: Implications for Validity

The effects of question previewing on response accuracy and text processing: An eye-movement study

The influence of language knowledge and test components on reading comprehension scores

Differentiating less-prepared from more-prepared college readers

Understanding the influence of text complexity and question type on reading outcomes

A Comparison of Two Methods of Administering Group Reading Inventories to Diverse Learners

Examining Differential Item Functioning In A Computer-Based English Proficiency Test

Test Fairness: Examining Differential Functioning of the Reading Comprehension Section of the GSEEE in China

Measurement of English Reading Ability by Reading Speed and Text Readability

The impact of test-taking strategies on eye movements of elementary students during reading comprehension assessment.

Similar but different: differences in comprehension diagnosis on the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability and the York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension

An Individual Differences Examination of the Relation between Reading Processes and Comprehension

Does Timed Testing Affect the Interpretation of Efficiency Scores?—A GLMM Analysis of Reading Components

Comparing Two Modes of Teaching a Question-Answering Strategy for Enhancing Reading Comprehension

Integrated Reading and Writing Tasks and ESL Students' Reading and Writing Performance in an English Language Test

Capturing individual differences in sentence processing: How reliable is the self-paced reading task?

Analyzing Multiple-Choice Reading and Listening Comprehension Tests

Identification of main ideas in expository texts: selection versus deletion

Children's Understanding and Cultural Factors in Reading Test Performance

Is the author recognition test a useful metric for native and non-native English speakers? An item response theory analysis

Organization of ideas in writing: what are raters sensitive to?