Abstract:Attachment theory proposes that close relationships help us to regulate our emotions in stressful and positive situations. However, no previous studies have examined preferences for a partner's emotional response to one's own stressful and positive situations or tested whether these preferences differ based on attachment orientation. This study examines the association of attachment orientation and preferences for partners' emotional responses relative to one's own emotional responses in stressful and positive contexts among 425 United States adults who were currently in a committed relationship of ≥6 months. Data were collected in 2020. Overall, participants preferred their partners to feel and express less distress, less worry, more calm, and more hope than themselves during stressful situations and for their partners to feel and express more excitement, pride, and hope than themselves during positive situations. Higher attachment anxiety predicted preferences for partners to feel and express more distress/worry in stressful situations, whereas higher attachment avoidance predicted preferences for partners to feel and express less hope in stressful situations. Statistical interactions of attachment anxiety × attachment avoidance indicated that the combination of low attachment anxiety and high attachment avoidance (dismissing avoidance) was associated with preferences for partners to feel and express less positive emotions in positive situations, whereas the combination of high attachment anxiety and high attachment avoidance (fearful avoidance) was associated with preferences for partners to feel and express more negative emotions in stressful situations and less positive emotions in positive situations. This investigation provides novel evidence for links between attachment orientation and preferences for partners' emotional responses in two theoretically important contexts, which has implications for the nature and function of emotion regulation in close relationships. Future research is needed to determine the generalizability of these findings to more collectivist cultural contexts.

Need Fulfillment and Emotional Experience in Interdependent Romantic Relationships

Emotional Expression and Ambivalence over Emotional Expression in Martial Relationship

A dyadic examination of self-determined sexual motives, need fulfillment, and relational outcomes among consensually non-monogamous partners

How Are Provided and Received Social Support Related to Relationship Satisfaction and Self-Esteem? A Comprehensive Test of Competing Hypotheses

Daily Well-Being: The Role of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness

Emotional Empathy in the Social Regulation of Distress: A Dyadic Approach

An Integrative Contextual Behavioral Science Model of Intimate Relations

Experienced Love: An Empirical Account

Motivations and Emotional Consequences Related to Engaging in Extramarital Relationships

Appraisal-emotion relationships in daily life.

Social bonding through shared experiences: the role of emotional intensity

Attachment anxiety in daily experiences of romantic relationships: An expansion of the mutual cyclical growth model

General Needs Satisfaction As a Mediator of the Relationship Between Ambivalence over Emotional Expression and Perceived Social Support

Transient Loneliness and the Perceived Provision and Receipt of Capitalization Support Within Event-Disclosure Interactions

Emotional conflict and well-being: Relation to perceived availability, daily utilization, and observer reports of social support.

May I Help You? The Relationship Between Interpersonal Emotion Regulation and Emotional and Relational Wellbeing in Daily Life

Attachment Orientation and Preferences for Partners' Emotional Responses in Stressful and Positive Situations

How can I help?: Specific strategies used in interpersonal emotion regulation in a relationship context.

The need to belong and its association with fully satisfying relationships: A tale of two measures

The Meanings of Love: An Introduction

Does Social Interaction Improve Emotional Experience Across Different Relationships? A Study Using Experience Sampling in Older Chinese Adults