Abstract:In many biological populations, such as human groups, individuals face a complex strategic setting, where they need to make strategic decisions over a diverse set of issues and their behavior in one strategic context can affect their decisions in another. This raises the question of how the interaction between different strategic contexts affects individuals' strategic choices and social norms? To address this question, I introduce a framework where individuals play two games with different structures and decide upon their strategy in a second game based on their knowledge of their opponent's strategy in the first game. I consider both multistage games, where the same opponents play the two games consecutively, and reputation-based model, where individuals play their two games with different opponents but receive information about their opponent's strategy. By considering a case where the first game is a social dilemma, I show that when the second game is a coordination or anti-coordination game, the Nash equilibrium of the coupled game can be decomposed into two classes, a defective equilibrium which is composed of two simple equilibrium of the two games, and a cooperative equilibrium, in which coupling between the two games emerge and sustain cooperation in the social dilemma. For the existence of the cooperative equilibrium, the cost of cooperation should be smaller than a value determined by the structure of the second game. Investigation of the evolutionary dynamics shows that a cooperative fixed point exists when the second game belongs to coordination or anti-coordination class in a mixed population. However, the basin of attraction of the cooperative fixed point is much smaller for the coordination class, and this fixed point disappears in a structured population. When the second game belongs to the anti-coordination class, the system possesses a spontaneous symmetry-breaking phase transition above which the symmetry between cooperation and defection breaks. A set of cooperation supporting moral norms emerges according to which cooperation stands out as a valuable trait. Notably, the moral system also brings a more efficient allocation of resources in the second game. This observation suggests a moral system has two different roles: Promotion of cooperation, which is against individuals' self-interest but beneficial for the population, and promotion of organization and order, which is at both the population's and the individual's self-interest. Interestingly, the latter acts like a Trojan horse: Once established out of individuals' self-interest, it brings the former with itself. Importantly, the fact that the evolution of moral norms depends only on the cost of cooperation and is independent of the benefit of cooperation implies that moral norms can be harmful and incur a pure collective cost, yet they are just as effective in promoting order and organization. Finally, the model predicts that recognition noise can have a surprisingly positive effect on the evolution of moral norms and facilitates cooperation in the Snow Drift game in structured populations.

THE ROLE OF SOCIAL STRUCTURE IN THE MAINTENANCE OF COOPERATIVE REGIMES

Does the Compelled Cooperation Determine the Structure of a Complex Network?

Interaction between games give rise to the evolution of moral norms of cooperation

The concurrent evolution of cooperation and the population structures that support it

Structured populations facilitate cooperation in policed Public Goods Games

Emergence of specialized third-party enforcement

Cooperation, Norms, and Revolutions: A Unified Game-Theoretical Approach

The Social Maintenance of Cooperation through Hypocrisy

Evolutionary dynamics for persistent cooperation in structured populations

Promotion of cooperation induced by the interplay between structure and game dynamics

Evolution of Cooperation in Social Dilemmas with Assortative Interactions

The rules of multiplayer cooperation in networks of communities

The dynamics of casual groups can keep free-riders at bay

Cognitive strategies take advantage of the cooperative potential of heterogeneous networks

Relative importance of social synergy, assortation and networks in the evolution of social cooperation

Cooperation without punishment

Source-sink cooperation dynamics constrain institutional evolution in a group-structured society

Social Dilemmas in an Online Social Network: the Structure and Evolution of Cooperation

Stability of pairwise social dilemma games: destructive agents, constructive agents, and their joint effects

Cooperation in costly-access environments