Abstract:We propose that the well-known dissociation between egocentric and exocentric distance perception (e.g., Loomis et al., 1992) is based on a distinction between two angular perceptual variables. Errors in exocentric distance tasks, such as the one underlying Gilinsky's (1951) experiments and the perception of depth/width ratio can be explained by biases in perceived optical slant. Errors in egocentric distance tasks, such as egocentric distance estimation, can be understood in terms of biases in the perception of angular declination. Whereas exocentric distance estimates typically demonstrate increasing compression with distance, egocentric distance estimates are normally compressed by a fairly constant amount. Li and Durgin (2010) have shown that exocentric aspect ratio tasks can be used as implicit measures of perceived optical slant which increase logarithmically with viewing distance. Here we further propose that explicit egocentric distance estimation can be treated as an implicit measure of perceived angular declination, which is biased in a linear fashion. To clarify that type of visual information matters more than type of task, we used an egocentric version of the depth/width aspect ratio task. Participants stood at one leg of an L-shape formed by them with two experimenters and were asked to position themselves the same distance from the central experimenter as the central experimenter was from the experimenter at the other leg of the L. Participants set themselves much too far from the central experimenter for all tested distances, consistent with overestimation of angular declination by a factor of about 1.5 (i.e., underestimation of egocentric distance by about 0.7). The egocentric aspect-ratio task provides evidence convergent with other explicit forms of egocentric distance estimation that perceived egocentric distance is underestimated. It also provides implicit quantitative confirmation of explicit evidence for the expanded coding of perceived angular declination, a variable important for motor control and spatial updating.

Cultural Differences in the Perception of a Three-Dimensional Ponzo Illusion

On the origin of the Ponzo illusion: An attentional account.

Two Distinct Angular Perceptual Variables Account for the Dissociation Between Egocentric and Exocentric Distance Perception

Large Perceptual Distortions of Locomotor Action Space Occur in Ground-Based Coordinates: Angular Expansion and the Large-Scale Horizontal-Vertical Illusion.

Body-centric and World-Centric Components of the Large-Scale Horizontal-Vertical Illusion.

Investigating Cultural Diversity for Extrafoveal Information Use in Visual Scenes.

Perceived Azimuth Direction is Exaggerated: Converging Evidence from Explicit and Implicit Measures

Slant Perception in Near Space is Categorically Biased: Evidence for a Vertical Tendency

Depth Compression Based on Mis-Scaling of Binocular Disparity May Contribute to Angular Expansion in Perceived Optical Slant.

Which Way is Up in the Horizontal-Vertical Illusion?

Position Shifts of Fmri-Based Population Receptive Fields in Human Visual Cortex Induced by Ponzo Illusion

Closely matched comparisons suggest that separable processes mediate contextual size illusions

Cultural Differences in Visual Search for Geometric Figures

Overlapping yet dissociable contributions of superiority illusion features to Ponzo illusion strength and metacognitive performance

The Working Memory Ponzo Illusion: Involuntary Integration of Visuospatial Information Stored in Visual Working Memory

Shifts of spatial attention in perceived 3-D space.

Age-related changes in the susceptibility to visual illusions of size

Culture, Control, and Perception of Relationships in the Environment.

Use and Misuse of Linear Perspective in the Perceptual Reconstruction of 3-D Perspective View Displays

Viewpoint adaptation revealed potential representational differences between 2D images and 3D objects

Distance Deception by Fragmented Objects: How Figures May Alter the Perceived Depth of the Background