Abstract:During the past 20 years, numerous studies have explored the R&D-marketing interface and its role in the new product development (NPD) process. Academics and practitioners (including a PDMA task force) have examined commonly used measures of success, the underlying reasons for the success or failure of NPD projects, and the effects of R&D-marketing integration on both project- and company-level success. Does this mean we have all the answers when it comes to ensuring the necessary level of cooperation and interaction between R&D and marketing? Of course not. Abbie Griffin and John R. Hauser note that prior research on R&D-marketing integration is being reassessed in light of the movement toward flatter organizational structures and cross-functional teams. To facilitate that reassessment, and to help guide future research in this area, they review recent research on the methods employed for integrating R&D and marketing, and they propose several hypotheses regarding those methods. They present their review and hypotheses within the framework of a causal map they have developed for studying functional integration. The causal map links cooperation to NPD success along situational dimensions, structural and process dimensions, and outcome dimensions. The desired outcome in any NPD effort is the timely commercialization of a profitable product. The situational dimensions address the amount and types of integration needed in a project, which depend on such factors as the project phase and the level of project uncertainty. The structural and process dimensions focus on the actions taken to achieve functional integration. These include relocation and physical facilities design, personnel movement, informal social systems, orgnizational structures, incentives and rewards, and formal integrative management processes. The proposed hypotheses focus on the methods for achieving functional integration—that is, the structural and process dimensions of the causal map. At first glance, these hypotheses seem to state the obvious. For example, few would challenge the notion that quality function deployment eliminates barriers to functional integration and improves information sharing between functions. However, achieving those benefits requires the presence of other factors such as senior management involvement. Rather than examine these hypotheses separately, researchers should explore the relative merits of the methods for achieving functional integratin. In other words, future research must consider both the situational and the structural and process dimensions of this framework.

Integrating Courses in Marketing Research and Engineering Design: An Instructional Technique for Enhancing the Product Development Process

Designing an interdisciplinary course: case study of an interdisciplinary project combining marketing research, engineering, and media arts

Integrating Engineering Science and Design: A Definition and Discussion*

Teaching Design Thinking in Marketing: Linking Product Design and Marketing Strategy in a Product Development Class

Integrating Small Team Project-Based Learning in Introductory Manufacturing Engineering Technology: Design, Manufacture, and Race Hot Wheels-Type Cars

Reverse Engineering and Redesign: Courses to Incrementally and Systematically Teach Design

Lessons in Teaching an Interdisciplinary Mechatronics Class

Preliminary Study on Students’ Experiences in Design-Based Interdisciplinary Learning

Engaging in Product Development as Means to Understand the Basics of Design

How do undergraduate engineering students conceptualize product design? An analysis of two third‐year design courses

Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature

AN INTEGRATED MODEL OF DIGITAL MARKETING CURRICULUM DESIGN

“That Cross-Curricular Business”: The Engineering Design Process in Mathematics and Science Classrooms

Integrated Information Rich Engineering Course Design

Integrating Industry Feedback into Interdisciplinary Course Design for Graduate Students

Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design

Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework

Integrating philosophy of science in civil engineering: an integrative course design strategy

Reframing Engineering Design: Integrating Design Thinking and Systems Thinking in Engineering Education and Practice to Address Wicked Problems

Teaching Interdisciplinary Design Between Architecture and Engineering: Finding Common Ground While Retaining Disciplinary Expertise

Design and Development of Small Modular Courses for “Education-Training Integration” in Vocational Colleges: A Case Study