Abstract:The mathematics problem solving approaches of a group of elementary and secondary ESL students were investigated through a performance assessment accompanied by think-aloud procedures. Students were enrolled in ESL mathematics classes in a Title VII project implementing the Cognitive Academic Learning Approach (CALLA). In this approach, curriculum content is used to develop academic language and learning strategies are taught explicitly to increase students' metacognitive awareness and to facilitate their learning of both content and language. Participating teachers were identified either as high implementation teachers (extensive involvement in staff development and other project activities) or low implementation teachers (limited involvement in project activities). The study was designed to identify learning and problem solving strategies of students at high, average and low mathematics achievement levels, and to compare strategic approaches of students in high implementation and low implementation classrooms. The results indicated that significantly more students in high implementation classrooms were able to solve the problem correctly than were students in low implementation classrooms. As expected, students rated high in math performance also performed significantly better on finding the correct problem solution. Of greater interest was the finding that there were no differences in the actual number of problem solving steps used by students in the two implementation levels, but that significant differences for high implementation classrooms were found for correct sequence of problem solving steps, which has been featured in instruction in the high implementation classrooms. This seemed to indicate that explicit instruction in a problem solving sequential procedure is helpful for ESL students. In addition, students in high implementation classrooms used significandy more metacognitive strategies than students in low implementation classrooms. High math ability students used the most metacognitive strategies in all types of classrooms. with average math ability students using fewer metacognitive strategies and low math ability students using the fewest metacognitive strategies. This finding seemed to indicate that students who were the highest achievers in mathematics and who received information about and practice in metacognitive strategies (such as planning, monitoring, and evaluating one's own learning) were better able to regulate their learning than less able math students or students in low implementation classrooms. Problems identified in the study were that even in high implementation classrooms, lower achieving students did not use the correct sequence of problem solving steps. Reasons could be attributed to differences in mathematics ability, differences in linguistic competence (since the task involved reading and understand a word problem), and/or amount of prior knowledge about learning and problem solving strategies. More research is needed to clarify these and other problems related to mathematics achievement of ESL students.

Systematic Progress Monitoring of Individualized Education Program Goals in Mathematics

Use of a Progress Monitoring System to Enable Teachers to Differentiate Mathematics Instruction

Using Technology to Assess Individualized Education Plan Goal Progress During Virtual Learning

Motivation Matters: Three Strategies to Support Motivation and Engagement in Mathematics

Preparing Preschool Educators to Monitor Child Progress

Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis

Effective Programs in Middle and High School Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis

Improving Mathematics Skills of High School Students

Investigating the Longitudinal Effects of a Core Mathematics Program on Evidence-Based Teaching Practices in Mathematics

Instructional Content and Self-Determination in Individualized Education Program Annual Goals for Students With Extensive Support Needs

An Updated Evidence-Based Practice Review on Teaching Mathematics to Students With Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities

Early grade curriculum-based reading measures for students with intellectual disability

Metacognitive Training in Professional Development Can Improve and Sustain Student Achievement

Math Abilities Among Children with Neurodevelopmental Difficulties: Understanding Cognitive Factors and Evaluating a Pilot Intervention

Comparing Schedules of Progress Monitoring Using Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading: A Replication Study

The Effect of Model-Based Problem Solving on the Performance of Students Who are Struggling in Mathematics

Learning and Problem Solving Strategies of ESL Students

Creating Mathematical Futures through an Equitable Teaching Approach: The Case of Railside School

A Meta-Analysis of Mathematics Interventions: Examining the Impacts of Intervention Characteristics

Do Components of Explicit Instruction Explain the Differential Effectiveness of a Core Mathematics Program for Kindergarten Students With Mathematics Difficulties? A Mediated Moderation Analysis

Utilizing Course Evaluation Data to Improve Student Learning and Success in Developmental Math Courses