Influence of Narcissistic CEOs on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Choices: The Moderating Role of the Legal Environment
Qingzhu Gao,Liangmou Gao,Dengjie Long,Yuege Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S414685
IF: 3.974
2023-08-12
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Qingzhu Gao, 1 Liangmou Gao, 1 Dengjie Long, 2 Yuege Wang 3 1 School of Business Administration, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, Liaoning, People's Republic of China; 2 Marxism College, Party School of Chongqing Committee of C.P.C, Chongqing, People's Republic of China; 3 Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand Correspondence: Dengjie Long, Marxism College, Party School of Chongqing Committee of C.P.C, 160 Yuzhou Road, Jiulongpo District, Chongqing, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 13036373662, Email Purpose: During recent years, there has been a growing interest in CSR across disciplines. Various scholars document that Chief Executive Officer (CEO) narcissism is an important factor that should not be overlooked when analyzing CSR. Research on the relationship between CEO narcissism and CSR has treated CSR as a whole construct. However, little attention has been paid to its effect on different dimensions of CSR, especially the same psychological trait may have effects on charitable donations and employee welfare. The purpose of the study is to explore the relationship between CEO narcissism and charitable donations and employee welfare, while taking into account the moderating role of the legal environment. Methods: This study used the video survey method to measure CEO narcissism, the video information was obtained from Baidu.com and hao.360.com search engines. Other data were collected from Chinese Stock Market Research (CSMAR) database. We used OLS regression for data analysis and also used Tobit regression model to check the robustness of the estimation results. Meanwhile, all analyses will be performed with Stata 16.0 software. Results: Empirical analysis reveals that CEO narcissism has a positive and significant impact on charitable donations and has a negative and significant impact on employee welfare. Moreover, the legal environment will reduce the effect of CEO narcissism on charitable donations and employee welfare, indicating that a stronger legal environment could attenuate the effect of CEO personality traits, especially narcissism on charity donations and employee welfare. Conclusion: This study contributes to the behavioral finance theory and stakeholder theory to better understand the relationship between CEO narcissism and charitable donations and employee welfare. Meanwhile, this study is one of the few studies to investigate the patterns of CSR activities in China, an important emerging economy. Keywords: CSR, CEO, legal environment, charitable donation, employee welfare, personality traits Research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been paying increasing attention to the antecedents, drivers, and motives of CSR. Much of the research could be classified into two major types: "outside-in" and "inside-out". The "outside-in" perspective focuses on the incentives and constraints of the external institutional environment and the value drivers of external stakeholders. The former focuses on the regulation of CSR behavior from the formal system, which reflects the government's facilitation approach to CSR through the formulation of rules and regulations (such as legal system, incentive system, evaluation system, and punishment system), and plays the governance function of the institutional entities in promoting CSR. 1 The latter emphasizes the effect of the constraints of industry associations among external stakeholders, 2 and the monitoring by the public on CSR behavior. 3 The "inside-out" perspective focuses on the impact of entrepreneurship and top management team heterogeneity on CSR. The former emphasizes the role of social entrepreneurship in driving organizations to create economic and social value. 4 The latter focuses on the impact of top management team characteristics, such as managerial compensation, 5 marital status, 6 political connection, 7 poverty experience, 8 and the CEOs' psychological traits 9 on CSR. The personal characteristics of the firm's top management team are specifically diverse, one of which is narcissism. Narcissism refers to a psychological construct involving personality traits, such as excessive egoism, self-superiority, lack of empathy, demands for admiration, control and power and self-image reinforcement that comes from external praise. Narcissism can be found among many groups of people, including CEOs. 10 The intersection of CEO narcissism and CSR has also received limited attention. Evidence suggests that narcissistic CEOs are more likely to devote implementing CSR activities. For example, Petrenko confirmed that narcissistic CE -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary