Abstract:We describe several experiments on contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system. As test stimuli we used characters that are often employed in optometric practice for testing visual acuity: Landolt C's, Snellen E's, and rectangular gratings. We tested several hypotheses that have been put forward to explain contour interaction and crowding effects. In Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, Landolt C's were the test stimuli, and bars, or Landolt C's, or gratings served as distractors. In Experiment 1, we showed that neither scale invariance nor spatial frequency selectivity is a characteristic of foveal crowding effects. These results allowed us to conclude that mechanisms other than lateral masking contribute to observers' performance in 'crowded' tasks. R. F. Hess, S. C. Dakin, and N. Kappor (2000) suggested that the spatial frequency band most appropriate for target recognition is shifted by the surrounding bars to higher spatial frequencies that cannot be resolved by observers. Our Experiment 2 rejects this hypothesis as the experimental data do not follow theoretical predictions. In Experiment 3, we employed Snellen E's, both as test stimuli and as distractors. The masking functions were similar to those measured in Experiment 1 when the test Landolt C was surrounded by Landolt C's. In Experiment 4, we extended the range of test stimuli to rectangular gratings; same-frequency or high-frequency gratings were distractors. In this case, if the distracting gratings had random orientation from trial to trial, the critical spacing was twice larger than in the first three experiments. If the orientation of the distractors was fixed during the whole experiment, the critical spacing was similar to that measured in the first three experiments. We suggest that the visual system can use different mechanisms for the discrimination of different test stimuli in the presence of particular surround. Different receptive fields with different spatial characteristics can be employed. To explain why crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system are not scale invariant, we suggest that a range of stimuli, slightly varying in size, may all be processed by the same neural channel--the channel with the smallest receptive fields of the visual system.

Set-Size Effects in Simple Visual Search for Contour Curvature

Cultural Differences in Visual Search for Geometric Figures

Perceptual Scale Expansion: A Natural Design for Improving the Precision of Motor Control.

Neuronal Correlates of the Set-Size Effect in Monkey Lateral Intraparietal Area

Visual search of illusory contours: The role of illusory contour clarity

Foveal contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system

Bayesian analysis on missing visual information and object complexity on visual search for object orientation and object identity

The reconfiguration of task set has no effect on the efficiency of feature search

Effect of 3-D depth structure, element size, and area containing elements on total-element overestimation phenomenon

Curved Versus Flat Monitors: Interactive Effects of Display Curvature Radius and Display Size on Visual Search Performance and Visual Fatigue

Optimal Visual Search with Highly Heuristic Decision Rules

Disrupting optimal decision making in visual foraging: The impact of search experience.

Closely matched comparisons suggest that separable processes mediate contextual size illusions

Interaction of disparity size and depth structure on perceived numerosity in a three-dimensional space

The Effects of the Binocular Disparity Differences Between Targets and Maskers on Visual Search

Gambling in the visual periphery: a conjoint-measurement analysis of human ability to judge visual uncertainty.

Physiological correlates of a simple saccadic-decision task to extended objects in superior colliculus

Measuring the visual angle of the mind's eye

Vertical size disparity and the correction of stereo correspondence

Visual search time in detection tasks with multiple targets: Considering change of the effective stimulus field area

Does crowding predict conjunction search? An individual differences approach