Abstract:This essay critically analyzes a common metaphor in political theory, which figures the growth of power as a process of “spreading” or “diffusion.” It argues that narratives that cast the generalization of power as a movement of “spreading” often fail to furnish the specific type of historical evidence that they imply, such that these narratives are frequently received as richly suggestive yet ultimately unjustified. This essay develops an alternative way of conceptualizing the generalization of power, one that rests on rigorous yet speculative evidence of the sort that political theorists are best positioned to find: not proof of literal extension or application of existing powers to new domains, but accidental convergences, isomorphisms, and ideal combinations among disparate practices that introduce large powers into the world. To do this, the essay revisits Foucault’s narrative of the generalization of disciplinary power in modern Western societies, which is perhaps the clearest source for the familiarity of the figure of “spread” in contemporary political theory. It shows that Foucault’s incessant use of the “spread” metaphor naturally invites the dismissive reading that Discipline and Punish received in many quarters, for it implies a historical process that Foucault cannot justify. Yet I argue that in a brief self-criticism, Foucault provides the rudiments for a conception of power’s generalization far more useful and compelling than the metaphoric of “spread.” I suggest that this alternative, if developed, is not just the proper frame for interpreting Foucault’s narrative, but a promising practical resource for contemporary theorists of general powers.

Discourse, Power, and Knowledge in the Management of “Big Science”

Building Multidisciplinary Research Fields: The Cases of Materials Science, Nanotechnology and Synthetic Biology

Domination in a Scientific Field

Viewing research assessment, the academic reward system, and academic publishing through the power/knowledge lens of Foucault

The Sciences Are Discursive Constructs: the Communication Perspective As an Empirical Philosophy of Science

Michel Foucault and the Problematics of Power: Theorizing DTCA and Medicalized Subjectivity

Foucault and Power: A Critique and Retheorization

Power, discourse, and policy: articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies

Power and the diffusion of management ideas: The case of McKinsey & Co

Discipline and Power in the Digital Age. Critical Reflections from Foucault’s Thought

Interdisciplinary Cases and Disciplinary Knowledge

The Communication Turn in Philosophy of Science

The Power Discourse from the View of the Western Rhetoric:Strategy and Reflection

Strategy, Discourse and Practice: The Intensification of Power

Knowledge Fields: Some Post-9/11 Thoughts about the Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm

From subjects to objects: Knowledge in International Relations theory

Constituting Identities That Challenge the Contemporary Discourse: Power, Discourse, Experience, and Emotion

Power, Discourse, and the Workplace: Reclaiming the Critical Tradition

Knowledge Synthesis for Scientific Management: Practical Integration for Complexity Versus Scientific Fragmentation for Simplicity

Does Power “Spread”? Foucault on the Generalization of Power

The power of discourse: Michel Foucault and critical theory