Gingival fibroblast response to (hybrid) ceramic implant reconstruction surfaces is modulated by biomaterial type and surface treatment
Kerstin Rabel,Andrea Blankenburg,Thorsten Steinberg,Ralf J Kohal,Benedikt C Spies,Erik Adolfsson,Siegbert Witkowski,Brigitte Altmann,Ralf J. Kohal,Benedikt C. Spies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2024.02.018
2024-02-25
Dental Materials Journal
Abstract:Highlights • Biomaterial and surface treatment determine surface topography of (hybrid) ceramics. • Surface topography is the key modulator of GF function on (hybrid) ceramics. • Polishing and glazing promote STI-relevant GF functions compared to machining. • Polished and glazed HC, LS, 4- and 5Y-PSZ surfaces show comparable GF response. Objectives Surface characteristics of implant reconstructions determine the gingival fibroblast (GF) response and thus soft tissue integration (STI). However, for monolithic implant reconstructions it is unknown whether the (hybrid) ceramic biomaterial type and its surface treatment affect GF response. Therefore, this investigation examined the influence of the implant reconstruction biomaterials hybrid ceramic (HC), lithium disilicate ceramic (LS), 4 and 5 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconiumdioxide ceramics (4/5Y-PSZ) and their surface treatment - machining, polishing or glazing - on surface characteristics and GF response. Methods After characterization of surface topography and wettability by scanning electron microscopy, interferometry and contact angle measurement, the adhesion, morphology, metabolic activity and proliferation of GFs from six donors was investigated by fluorescent staining and a resazurin-based assay at days 1, 3 and 7. Titanium (Ti) served as control. Results Biomaterial type and surface treatment affected the GF response in a topography-dependent manner. Smooth polished and glazed surfaces demonstrated enhanced GF adhesion and earlier proliferation onset compared to rough machined surfaces. Due to minor differences in surface topography of polished and glazed surfaces, however, the GF response was similar for polished and glazed HC, LS, 4- and 5Y-PSZ as well as Ti. Significance Within the limits of the present investigation, polishing and glazing of machined HC, LS and 4/5Y-PSZ can be recommended to support STI-relevant cell functions in GF. Since the GF response on polished and glazed HC, LS, 4- and 5Y-PSZ surfaces and the Ti control was comparable, this investigation proofed equal cytocompatibility of these surfaces in vitro.
materials science, biomaterials,dentistry, oral surgery & medicine