Circulating regulatory T cells predict efficacy and atypical responses in lung cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors

Da Hyun Kang,Chaeuk Chung,Pureum Sun,Da Hye Lee,Song-I Lee,Dongil Park,Jeong Suk Koh,Yoonjoo Kim,Hyon-Seung Yi,Jeong Eun Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-03018-y
2021-07-18
Abstract:Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for a variety of cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we investigated the frequency of pseudoprogression and hyperprogression in lung cancer patients treated with ICIs in the real world and aimed to discover a novel candidate marker to distinguish pseudoprogression from hyperprogression soon after ICI treatment. Methods This study included 74 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors at Chungnam National University Hospital (CNUH) between January 2018 and August 2020. Chest X-rays were examined on day 7 after the first ICI dose to identify changes in the primary mass, and the response was assessed by computed tomography (CT). We evaluated circulating regulatory T (Treg) cells using flow cytometry and correlated the findings with clinical outcomes. Results The incidence of pseudoprogression was 13.5%, and that of hyperprogression was 8.1%. On day 7 after initiation of treatment, the frequency of CD4 + CD25 + CD127 lo FoxP3 + Treg cells was significantly decreased compared with baseline ( P = 0.038) in patients who experienced pseudoprogression and significantly increased compared with baseline ( P = 0.024) in patients who experienced hyperprogression. In the responder group, the frequencies of CD4 + CD25 + CD127 lo FoxP3 + Treg cells and PD-1 + CD4 + CD25 + CD127 lo FoxP3 + Treg cells were significantly decreased 7 days after commencement of treatment compared with baseline ( P = 0.034 and P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Circulating Treg cells represent a promising potential dynamic biomarker to predict efficacy and differentiate atypical responses, including pseudoprogression and hyperprogression, after immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?