Abstract:We present a linear rank preserving model (RPM) approach for analyzing mediation of a randomized baseline intervention's effect on a univariate follow-up outcome. Unlike standard mediation analyses, our approach does not assume that the mediating factor is also randomly assigned to individuals in addition to the randomized baseline intervention (i.e., sequential ignorability), but does make several structural interaction assumptions that currently are untestable. The G-estimation procedure for the proposed RPM represents an extension of the work on direct effects of randomized intervention effects for survival outcomes by Robins and Greenland (1994, Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 737-749) and on intervention non-adherence by Ten Have et al. (2004, Journal of the American Statistical Association 99, 8-16). Simulations show good estimation and confidence interval performance by the proposed RPM approach under unmeasured confounding relative to the standard mediation approach, but poor performance under departures from the structural interaction assumptions. The trade-off between these assumptions is evaluated in the context of two suicide/depression intervention studies.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in the influence of randomized baseline intervention on continuous outcomes, how to use causal mediation analysis to evaluate whether this influence occurs directly or indirectly through some mediating factor. Specifically, the article proposes a Rank Preserving Model (RPM) method to analyze the influence of randomized baseline intervention on univariate follow - up outcomes and explore whether this influence is achieved through some mediating factor. ### Key Issues and Challenges 1. **Non - parametric Identification Problem**: - The direct effect cannot be non - parametrically identified from the data because the number of parameters exceeds the number of identification estimation equations. - To solve this problem, model assumptions need to be introduced to increase the number of identification estimation equations. 2. **Unmeasured Confounding Factors**: - Standard mediation analysis methods usually assume that the mediating factor has no unmeasured confounding factors (i.e., "sequential ignorability"), but this assumption is usually untestable. - The method proposed in the article does not require the assumption that the mediating factor is also randomly assigned, but relies on some structural interaction assumptions, which are also currently untestable. 3. **Comparing the Performance of Different Methods**: - The article compares the performance of the RPM method and the standard mediation analysis method in the presence of unmeasured confounding factors through simulation studies. - The results show that in the case of unmeasured confounding factors, the estimation and confidence interval performance of the RPM method are better than those of the standard mediation analysis method, but it performs worse when deviating from the structural interaction assumptions. ### Research Background and Application The article uses data from two suicide/depression intervention studies to compare the inference results under different assumptions: 1. **Suicide Treatment Study**: - Compare the effects of cognitive therapy and routine care on suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, feelings of hopelessness, and depressive symptoms. - Evaluate whether the significant intention - to - treat effect of cognitive therapy on the Beck Depression Inventory - II (BDI) score after 6 months is achieved through a direct effect other than non - study treatment (mediating variable). 2. **Suicide Prevention Study**: - Compare the effects of collaborative care management and routine care on elderly patients with depression to reduce the risk of suicide. - Evaluate whether the significant intention - to - treat effect of collaborative care management on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score after 4 months is achieved through a direct effect other than antidepressant prescribing (mediating variable). ### Summary The core objective of this paper is to provide a new method (RPM) to deal with complex problems in causal mediation analysis, especially when the strict assumptions required for standard mediation analysis cannot be met. Through this method, researchers can better understand how the effects of randomized interventions are transmitted through specific mediating factors, thereby providing a more accurate basis for future intervention design and effect evaluation.

Causal Mediation Analyses with Rank Preserving Models

Causal Models for Mediation Analysis: an Introduction to Structural Mean Models.

Causal Mediation Analysis in the Multilevel Intervention and Multicomponent Mediator Case

Causal Mediation Analysis in the Context of Clinical Research.

Mediation Analysis Without Sequential Ignorability: Using Baseline Covariates Interacted with Random Assignment as Instrumental Variables

Causal Mediation Analysis with Sure Outcomes of Random Events Model

Robust Mediation Analysis Based on Median Regression.

On estimating causal controlled direct and mediator effects for count outcomes without assuming sequential ignorability

Causal Mediation Analysis With a Binary Outcome and Multiple Continuous or Ordinal Mediators: Simulations and Application to an Alcohol Intervention

Causal mediation analysis: From simple to more robust strategies for estimation of marginal natural (in)direct effects

Robust and Flexible Estimation of Stochastic Mediation Effects: A Proposed Method and Example in a Randomized Trial Setting

Robust Inference for Mediated Effects in Partially Linear Models

Stein-like estimators for causal mediation analysis in randomized trials

Clinically Relevant Mediation Analysis using Controlled Indirect Effect

Causal mediation analysis in presence of multiple mediators uncausally related

A Bayesian nonparametric approach for causal mediation with a post-treatment confounder

Statistical Mediation Analysis for Models with a Binary Mediator and a Binary Outcome: the Differences Between Causal and Traditional Mediation Analysis

Non-linear Mediation Analysis with High-dimensional Mediators whose Causal Structure is Unknown

A Framework for Mediation Analysis with Multiple Exposures, Multivariate Mediators, and Non-Linear Response Models

Causal mediation analysis for stochastic interventions

Semiparametric causal mediation analysis in cluster-randomized experiments