Abstract:This article begins by situating modern‐day second language acquisition (SLA) research in a historical context, tracing its evolution from cognitive to social to sociocognitive accounts. Next, the influence of the zeitgeist is considered. In this era of rapid change and turmoil, there are both perils and opportunities afforded by globalization. In addition, what globalization is bringing to the forefront is a need to grapple with the complexity of the world. It follows then that we need to think differently about SLA. I suggest that this thinking take two directions. The first is that the researchers in the field adopt an ecological perspective, whereby the relations among factors are what is key to elucidating the complexity. I offer as an example overcoming the bifurcation between research on individual differences and research on the SLA process. Doing so ushers in a person‐centered, humanistic dimension of SLA. A second, related change is the renewed awareness of the importance of context and of the nature of constraints that shape any particular context. Language learning does not occur in an ideological vacuum but rather is affected in a serious way by prevailing beliefs in the society at large. I therefore make the case for language researchers to be more mindful of the social injustices that exist in the world concerning language learning and use, and I indicate several of the ideologies and myths that deserve to be challenged accordingly. Before concluding, I discuss the implications of these two changes for issues of language assessment, research, and teaching. How can the field of second language acquisition/development help learners to cope with the complexity and dynamism of the world we live in? An ecological approach that is considerate of the learning context and learners’ individual differences and that teaches them to adapt and make use of access‐creating affordances offers a logical choice.

Alignment and Interaction in a Sociocognitive Approach to Second Language Acquisition

Multi‐Level Linguistic Alignment in a Dynamic Collaborative Problem‐Solving Task

Stylistic alignment in natural conversation involving second language speakers

Studying Alignment in a Collaborative Learning Activity via Automatic Methods: The Link Between What We Say and Do

Alignment in Multimodal Interaction: An Integrative Framework

Effects of interactive alignment on L2 vocabulary learning by Chinese EFL learners

Lexical Alignment is Pervasive Across Contexts in Non‐WEIRD Adult–Child Interactions

The Problem of Alignment

Structural alignment in incidental word learning . To appear in

Understanding the Learning Dynamics of Alignment with Human Feedback

Alignment and embodiment in a play script writing process: A sociocognitive perspective

Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition

Alignment Studio: Aligning Large Language Models to Particular Contextual Regulations

Sociocultural theory and concept-based language instruction

Exploring Sociocultural Theory Application in Online Language Courses

Vocabulary Alignment in the Continuation Task of Translation

LLM Theory of Mind and Alignment: Opportunities and Risks

Introduction: Combining learner psychology and ISLA research: Intersections in the classroom

Self-Alignment: Improving Alignment of Cultural Values in LLMs via In-Context Learning

Essentials of a Theory of Language Cognition