Predictors of study dropout in cognitive-behavioural therapy with a trauma focus for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: An individual participant data meta-analysis
Simonne Wright,Eirini Karyotaki,Pim Cuijpers,Jonathan Bisson,Davide Papola,Anke B Witteveen,Sudie E Back,Dana Bichescu-Burian,Liuva Capezzani,Marylene Cloitre,Grant J Devilly,Thomas Elbert,Marcelo Mello,Julian D Ford,Damion Grasso,Pedro Gamito,Richard Gray,Moira Haller,Nigel Hunt,Rolf J Kleber,Julia König,Claire Kullack,Jonathan Laugharne,Rachel Liebman,Christopher William Lee,Jeannette Lely,John C. Markowitz,Candice Monson,Mirjam J Nijdam,Sonya B Norman,Miranda Olff,Tahereh Mina Orang,Luca Ostacoli,Nenad Paunovic,Eva Petkova,Patricia Resick,Rita Rosner,Maggie Schauer,Joy M Schmitz,Ulrich Schnyder,Brian N. Smith,Anka A Vujanovic,Yinyin Zang,Érica Panzani Duran,Francisco Lotufo Neto,Soraya Seedat,Marit Sijbrandij
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301159
2024-11-16
Evidence-Based Mental Health
Abstract:Background Available empirical evidence on participant-level factors associated with dropout from psychotherapies for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is both limited and inconclusive. More comprehensive understanding of the various factors that contribute to study dropout from cognitive-behavioural therapy with a trauma focus (CBT-TF) is crucial for enhancing treatment outcomes. Objective Using an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) design, we examined participant-level predictors of study dropout from CBT-TF interventions for PTSD. Methods A comprehensive systematic literature search was undertaken to identify randomised controlled trials comparing CBT-TF with waitlist control, treatment-as-usual or another therapy. Academic databases were screened from conception until 11 January 2021. Eligible interventions were required to be individual and in-person delivered. Participants were considered dropouts if they did not complete the post-treatment assessment. Findings The systematic literature search identified 81 eligible studies (n=3330). Data were pooled from 25 available CBT-TF studies comprising 823 participants. Overall, 221 (27%) of the 823 dropped out. Of 581 civilians, 133 (23%) dropped out, as did 75 (42%) of 178 military personnel/veterans. Bivariate and multivariate analyses indicated that military personnel/veterans (RR 2.37) had a significantly greater risk of dropout than civilians. Furthermore, the chance of dropping out significantly decreased with advancing age (continuous; RR 0.98). Conclusions These findings underscore the risk of premature termination from CBT-TF among younger adults and military veterans/personnel. Clinical implication Understanding predictors can inform the development of retention strategies tailored to at-risk subgroups, enhance engagement, improve adherence and yield better treatment outcomes.
psychiatry