Abstract:The duty to prevent significant transboundary harm remains a cornerstone principle of international law, and especially of international environmental and water resources law. However, this rule focuses on the conduct of a State where harm originates, rather than on the fact that harm has resulted from such conduct, and thus requires that States exercise due diligence in anticipating and in preventing or mitigating such harm. At a practical level, the due diligence standard of conduct expected of States can be uncertain and difficult to determine, as it must be deduced from the applicable primary rules of international environmental or water resources law, which have traditionally been elaborated in rather vague terms. In addition, the standard of due diligence required under the no-harm rule may be influenced by a range of variable and context-specific factors which might prove relevant in the particular circumstances of any dispute. Such uncertainty is further compounded in the field of international water law by the complex interrelationship between the no-harm rule and the other key norms of international water law, particularly the cardinal principle of equitable and reasonable utilization, which embodies a high degree of flexibility and adaptability and suffers from a corresponding degree of normative indeterminacy. Thankfully, recent developments in international water law and related practice regarding the requirement to protect riverine ecosystems and maintain related ecosystem services lend a welcome measure of clarity as regards the preventive measures expected of watercourse States under international law. Judicial recognition of obligations to maintain minimum environmental flows and to preserve or restore riverine ecosystem services, based on the proliferation of such values in treaty and declarative practice, along with the continuing development of sophisticated technical methodologies for ecosystems assessment and evaluation, do much to inform the due diligence conduct required of States. Such advances can only enhance the practical utility of the no-harm rule, and thus of the entire corpus of international water law, in addressing the challenges emerging globally for water resources management in the twenty-first century.

The 1997 UN Convention on the Law of Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses: Its Strengths and Weaknesses from a Water Management Perspective and the Need for New Workable Guidelines

Rivers and Reciprocity: Perceptions and Policy on International Watercourses

Data sharing in transboundary water management

A review of the evolution and state of transboundary freshwater treaties

The contribution of the law of the sea convention to marine environmental protection: 40 years of shimmering seas or high hopes dashed against juridical rocks?

International Water Law in Multi-scale Governance of Shared Waters in the Anthropocene: Towards Cooperation, not “Water Wars”

The current state of development of the no significant harm principle: How far have we come?

Studys on Interest Compensation Mechanisms for the Coordination of the Water Resource Utilization

International borders, ground water flow, and hydroschizophrenia

Hydrology and Water Law - Bridging the Gap

Emerging Issues and Challenges in Transboundary Freshwater: The Role of Treaties and Treaty Design

The role of science in international water law

Re-examining the Harmon Doctrine

Strengths and Limitations of The Indonesian Constitutional Court’s “6 Basic Principles” in Resolving Water Conflicts

A framework for resolving the transboundary water allocation conflict conundrum

Some challenges of treaty regulation of international relations in the field of environmental protection

International Legal Regulation in the Field of Environmental Protection: History, Currents Situation, Prospects for the Future

Article 41 . Sea lanes and traffic separation schemes in straits used for international navigation

Transboundary Water Governance Scholarship: A Critical Review

Rationale for Convergence of Institutional Arrangements Based on Individualized Approach to Cross-Border Water Pollution

Conjunctive use in water resource management: current trends and future directions