Computation and Representation in Cognitive Translation Studies

Michael Carl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69777-8_13
2021-01-01
Abstract:A separation is recently being construed within cognitive translation studies (CTS) between translation process research (TPR) and cognitive translatology (CT), in which TPR is said to implement a computational approach, while CT endorses 4EA approaches. For Muñoz (2017) TPR and CT represent “mutually exclusive views on human cognition,” and some research seems to adopt this view (Xiao and Muñoz 2020; Halverson 2019, among others). Muñoz’ statement stipulates that either TPR is incompatible with basic assumptions of 4EA or CT is not computational. We investigate various notions of “computation,” some of which rely on a specific meaning of representation. We contend that TPR has mainly developed methodologies for empirical research and has not, in general, made any particular theoretical or representational commitment. CT, in contrast, supports ontological (i.e., 4EA) views on cognition while being agnostic with respect to methodological issues. We conclude that TPR is compatible with at least some flavors of the CT ontological perspective and that a mechanistic view on computation may offer a more comprehensive prospective on CTS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?