Maintaining relationships with retailers

Gary Davies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09652549400000010

1994-09-01

Journal of Strategic Marketing

Abstract:The maintenance of relationships with retailers is as important strategically to a supplier of consumer products as is its marketing to final consumers. The relationship between retailer and supplier is threatened if the retail buyer decides to delist or to deselect one of the supplier's products. The relationship ends when all a supplier's products are delisted. While commercial factors may be important in the decision making of retail buyers, other factors can be significant in prompting or preventing a decision to delist a product or supplier. The relationship between retail buyer and supplier was investigated by questioning buyers about the circumstances surrounding the delisting of products and any subsequent delisting of the supplier. Buyers were asked about their perceived level of conflict, cooperation and partner- ship with the supplier, the nature and frequency of exchange of information and the nature of trade marketing support. The aims of the research were to identify what, if anything, about the relationship typified the context for a decision to delist a product and what, if anything, was important in the retention of the supplier following the delisting of a product. The effects of different contextual variables, that might be expected to affect the relationship, the size of the retail business, and whether the product was a branded or own brand product are tested. A number of hypotheses about the importance of individual factors are tested by comparing whether the delisting of a product led to the delisting of the supplier. While relationships seen by the retail buyer as more cooperative were more stable, those seen as more fir11 of conflict were no more likely to be unstable. Failing and failed relationships were not associated with high levels of conflict as perceived by retail buyers. For the relationship to be seen as a partnership can be important with larger retailers, and having a social dimension to the relationship is also important. No evidence was obtained that individual elements of trade marketing support are relevant to sustaining relationships. Evidence was obtained to support the view that frequency of contact and exchange of information are important in maintaining relationships with retailers. The most important factors in predicting whether a relationship would fail totally were whether the retail buyer saw the relationship as ‘cooperative’ and ‘businesslike’ and whether or not there was frequent communication.