Abstract:Abstract This paper identifies a significant gap in existing work within the field of educational technology—the failure to explain technology theoretically—and proposes an agenda for addressing this. While there are discussions of theory within educational technology research, these typically focus on learning. Technology itself is seldom considered, being treated instead as “natural” or given. This is in marked contrast to other fields of study, in which robust theories of technology have been developed. The consequence of this is that technology is treated as if it will cause learning—and when it does not, there is no clear explanation of why. To advance this discussion, two traditions of work theorising technology are introduced—one positivistic, including work on affordance, and the other (largely unrepresented in educational technology) that provides a social account. An example of each is used to analyse a case study, so as to contrast the kind of claims that currently get made about technology with those that we could make. It is argued that adopting a social account of technology would enable richer, better‐integrated claims to be made about technology use. Practitioner Notes What is already known about this topic Technology is a central concern of research in the field, but it is not clear how we should think about this term. While work in the field some decades ago tried to conceptualise technology, it is now treated as a taken‐for‐granted category. What this paper adds Systematic evidence is provided that we rely on a “common sense” understanding of technology. The idea of technology is explicitly debated in other fields of study, and two of those traditions are reviewed here. An example is provided that illustrates that these other conceptions of technology can provide richer accounts of empirical work than those currently dominant in the field. Implications for practice and/or policy We cannot assume that technology will simply have “effects” on people. Alternative accounts of technology provide richer explanations of technology use, and would benefit the field.

TOOLS AND TOYS : Communicating gendered positions towards technology

The power of code: women and the making of the digital world

Between Frustration and Invigoration: Women Talking about Digital Technology at Work

Gender And New Icts

Gender disruptions in the digital industries?

Technology in children’s picture books as an agent for reinforcing or challenging traditional gender stereotypes

Digital Communication Tools for Fostering Career Advancement and Sustaining Interpersonal Relationships

Implicit, Explicit, and Structural Barriers and Facilitators for Information and Communication Technology Access in Older Adults

Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technology and Society: 6th International Conference, ITAP 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part III

The Gender Gap in the Digital Era: Reaching Algorithmic Fairness and Technological Inclusivity in Network Society

Beyond the Command: Feminist STS Research and Critical Issues for the Design of Social Machines

Sex, gender and work segregation in the cultural industries

Gendering digital labor: work and family digital communication across 29 countries

Technology Configuring the User: Implications for the Redesign of Electronic Information Systems in Social Work

Beyond the Boolean: How Programmers Ask About, Use, and Discuss Gender

Theorizing femininity in artificial intelligence: a framework for undoing technology’s gender troubles

Female librarians and male computer programmers? Gender bias in occupational images on digital media platforms

For Better or for Worse? A Framework for Critical Analysis of ICT4D for Women

Learning technology: Theorising the tools we study

Tools of the trade: analyzing technology as object in nursing

Gender Differences in Perception of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools