Abstract:The State Council of the People's Republic of China has declared its intention to introduce AI into the Chinese criminal justice system including the imposition of criminal sentences. This plan has, however, raised a range of troubling questions and concerns which include the misinterpretation of court decisions by AI, the incapability of AI to make value judgements, possible biases of algorithms, selectivity of data used by AI, the "black box" character of sentencing by AI, diminished acceptance of AI-supported sentencing systems by the public, uncertain quality of algorithms, etc. The positive effect of AI on the goal of "same case, same sentence" therefore should not be overstated, and an unlimited application of AI must be avoided. Chinese policy makers should therefore use great caution when integrating AI into sentencing. AI should be employed not as a decision-maker but only as an "assistant", providing information for judges and aiding them in making sentencing decisions. The final determination should in any event remain in the hands of the judges. Moreover, algorithms should be made transparent so that judges can review their operation. A Committee supervised by the Chinese Supreme Court should be established to guarantee the quality of judicial data used by AI and to operate a centralized AI system on sentencing. These measures would contribute to making the best use of judicial data and to introducing a fair, accurate, and efficient sentencing system.

Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms and Sentencing in Chinese Criminal Justice: Problems and Solutions