Abstract:The low phytic acid (lpa), or “low-phytate” seed trait can provide numerous potential benefits to the nutritional quality of foods and feeds and to the sustainability of agricultural production. Major benefits include enhanced phosphorus (P) management contributing to enhanced sustainability in non-ruminant (poultry, swine, and fish) production; reduced environmental impact due to reduced waste P in non-ruminant production; enhanced “global” bioavailability of minerals (iron, zinc, calcium, magnesium) for both humans and non-ruminant animals; enhancement of animal health, productivity and the quality of animal products; development of “low seed total P” crops which also can enhance management of P in agricultural production and contribute to its sustainability. Evaluations of this trait by industry and by advocates of biofortification via breeding for enhanced mineral density have been too short term and too narrowly focused. Arguments against breeding for the low-phytate trait overstate the negatives such as potentially reduced yields and field performance or possible reductions in phytic acid’s health benefits. Progress in breeding or genetically-engineering high-yielding stress-tolerant low-phytate crops continues. Perhaps due to the potential benefits of the low-phytate trait, the challenge of developing high-yielding, stress-tolerant low-phytate crops has become something of a holy grail for crop genetic engineering. While there are widely available and efficacious alternative approaches to deal with the problems posed by seed-derived dietary phytic acid, such as use of the enzyme phytase as a feed additive, or biofortification breeding, if there were an interest in developing low-phytate crops with good field performance and good seed quality, it could be accomplished given adequate time and support. Even with a moderate reduction in yield, in light of the numerous benefits of low-phytate types as human foods or animal feeds, should one not grow a nutritionally-enhanced crop variant that perhaps has 5% to 10% less yield than a standard variant but one that is substantially more nutritious? Such crops would be a benefit to human nutrition especially in populations at risk for iron and zinc deficiency, and a benefit to the sustainability of agricultural production.

Oilseed phytates: Nutritional implications

Examination of the functional properties, protein quality, and iron bioavailability of low-phytate pea protein ingredients

An insight into phytic acid biosynthesis and its reduction strategies to improve mineral bioavailability

Phytic acid: a reservoir of phosphorus in seeds plays a dynamic role in plant and animal metabolism

Dietary roles of phytate and phytase in human nutrition: A review

[The role of phytates in human nutrition]

Nutritional significance of phytic acid and phytase

The Research Progress on Metabolism and Related Enzymes of Phytic Acid in Crop Grains

Phytic Acid and Whole Grains for Health Controversy

Phytic Acid Content of Faba Beans (Vicia faba)—Annual and Varietal Effects, and Influence of Organic Cultivation Practices

Nutritional Benefits of Phytase and Dietary Determinants of its Efficacy

Oxalate and phytate concentrations in seeds of soybean cultivars [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]

Oxalate and phytate of soy foods

The impact of processing on phytic acid, in vitro soluble iron and Phy/Fe molar ratio of faba bean (Vicia faba L.).

Dietary Phytic Acid, Dephytinization, and Phytase Supplementation Alter Trace Element Bioavailability—A Narrative Review of Human Interventions

Low phytic acid Crops: Observations Based on Four Decades of Research

Phytate and phytase: consequences for protein utilisation

A Review of Phytic Acid Sources, Obtention, and Applications

Anti-nutritional effect of phytates – extraphosphoric effect of phytase

Iron, Zinc and Phytic Acid Retention of Biofortified, Low Phytic Acid, and Conventional Bean Varieties When Preparing Common Household Recipes

Genes controlling low phytic acid in plants: Identifying targets for barley breeding