Abstract:Issue: The way educators think about the nature of competence, the approaches one selects for the assessment of competence, what generated data implies, and what counts as good assessment now involve broader and more diverse interpretive processes. Broadening philosophical positions in assessment has educators applying different interpretations to similar assessment concepts. As a result, what is claimed through assessment, including what counts as quality, can be different for each of us despite using similar activities and language. This is leading to some uncertainty on how to proceed or worse, provides opportunities for questioning the legitimacy of any assessment activity or outcome. While some debate in assessment is inevitable, most have been within philosophical positions (e.g., how best to minimize error), whereas newer debates are happening across philosophical positions (e.g., whether error is a useful concept). As new ways of approaching assessment have emerged, the interpretive nature of underlying philosophical positions has not been sufficiently attended to. Evidence: We illustrate interpretive processes of assessment in action by: (a) summarizing the current health professions assessment context from a philosophical perspective as a way of describing its evolution; (b) demonstrating implications in practice using two examples (i.e., analysis of assessment work and validity claims); and (c) examining pragmatism to demonstrate how even within specific philosophical positions opportunities for variable interpretations still exist. Implications: Our concern is not that assessment designers and users have different assumptions, but that practically, educators may unknowingly (or insidiously) apply different assumptions, and methodological and interpretive norms, and subsequently settle on different views on what serves as quality assessment even for the same assessment program or event. With the state of assessment in health professions in flux, we conclude by calling for a philosophically explicit approach to assessment, and underscore assessment as, fundamentally, an interpretive process - one which demands the careful elucidation of philosophical assumptions to promote understanding and ultimately defensibility of assessment processes and outcomes.

Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment

Exploring Relations Between Formative and Summative Assessment

Three Foci of Mathematic Teachers' Considerations in Evaluation of School Students' Achievements

Getting at Student Understanding - the Key to Teachers’ Use of Test Data

The Purpose and Perception of Learning Objectives

Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom

Assessments in Education

Examining Elementary School Teachers Perceptions of and Use of Formative Assessment in Mathematics

Shifting Conceptions of Validity in Educational Measurement: Implications for Performance Assessment

Understanding Formative Assessment in the Classroom

Conceptualising Assessment and Learning in the CLIL Context. An Introduction

Formative Assessment for the Common Core Literacy Standards

Understanding how teachers practise inclusive classroom assessment

Alternative perspectives on learning outcomes: challenges for assessment

Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning

A Contrastive Analysis of Classroom-Based Language Assessments

Attending to Variable Interpretations of Assessment Science and Practice

Purposes of Arts Education

Teacher Assessment and Teacher Change in Classroom Communication Behaviors

What are we assessing? An analysis of the most common concept inventories in physics

Rethinking authentic assessment: work, well-being, and society