Abstract:This article begins by recounting a series of mass surveillance practices conducted by members of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance. While boundary- and intersubjectivity-based theories of privacy register some of the harms linked to such practices I demonstrate how neither are holistically capable of registering these harms. Given these theories’ deficiencies I argue that critiques of signals intelligence surveillance practices can be better grounded on why the practices intrude on basic communicative rights, including those related to privacy. The crux of the argument is that pervasive mass surveillance erodes essential boundaries between public and private spheres by compromising populations’ abilities to freely communicate with one another and, in the process, erodes the integrity of democratic processes and institutions. Such erosions are captured as privacy violations but, ultimately, are more destructive to the fabric of society than are registered by theories of privacy alone. After demonstrating the value of adopting a communicative rights approach to critique signals intelligence surveillance I conclude by arguing that this approach also lets us clarify the international normative implications of such surveillance, that it provides a novel way of conceptualizing legal harm linked to the surveillance, and that it showcases the overall value of focusing on the implications of interfering with communications first, and as such interferences constituting privacy violations second. Ultimately, by adopting this Habermasian inspired mode of analysis we can develop more holistic ways of conceptualizing harms associated with signals intelligence practices than are provided by either boundary- or intersubjective-based theories of privacy.

Media, communication and the establishment of public camera surveillance programmes in Canada

Policy Mutations, Compliance Myths, and Redeployable Special Event Public Camera Surveillance in Canada

New public management and the extension of police control: community safety and security networks in Canada

Communication work and electronic surveillance: A model for predicting panoptic effects

Public Surveillance Cameras and Crime

Understanding Age-Related Differences in Privacy-Safety Decisions: Acceptance of Crime Surveillance Technologies in Urban Environments

Cops in crisis?: ethnographic insights on a new era of politicization, activism, accountability, and change in transatlantic policing

Public Attitudes Towards Government Surveillance of Social Media in Australia

Between Care and Control: Examining Surveillance Practices in Harm Reduction

Predicting citizens’ support for surveillance cameras. Does police legitimacy matter?

Immigration status and policing in Canada: current problems, activist strategies and abolitionist visions

Cost-Effectiveness of CCTV Surveillance Systems: Evidence from a Polish City

Using Video Cameras as a Research Tool in Public Spaces: Addressing Ethical and Information Governance Challenges Under Data Protection Legislation

Public support for government use of network surveillance: An empirical assessment of public understanding of ethics in science administration

Aerial Video Surveillance in a Megacity: A Case Study in Santiago, Chile

Exploring Public's Perception of Safety and Video Surveillance Technology: A Survey Approach

From Community to Public Safety Governance in Policing and Child Protection

Beyond Privacy: Articulating the Broader Harms of Pervasive Mass Surveillance

Police body-worn cameras and privacy: Views and concerns of officers and citizens

CCTV-Exposure: An open-source system for measuring user's privacy exposure to mapped CCTV cameras based on geo-location (Extended Version)

Critical Surveillance Art in the Age of Machine Vision and Algorithmic Governmentality: Three Case Studies