Abstract:Over the past three decades, the U.S. judiciary has grown increasingly less receptive to claims by convicted felons as to the conditions of their confinement while in prison. Although courts have not articulated a return to the "hands off" policy of the 1950s, it is clear that it has become significantly more difficult for prisoners to prevail in constitutional correctional litigation. The passage and aggressive implementation of the Prison Litigation Reform Act has been a powerful disincentive to such litigation in many areas of prisoners' rights law. From the perspective of the prisoner, the legal landscape is more hopeful in matters that relate to mental health care and treatment. Here, in spite of a general trend toward more stringent applications of standards of proof and a reluctance to order sweeping, intrusive remedies, some courts have aggressively protected prisoners' rights to be free from "deliberate indifference" to serious medical needs, and to be free from excessive force on the part of prison officials. A mostly hidden undercurrent in some prisoners' rights litigation has been the effort on the part of some plaintiffs' lawyers to look to international human rights doctrines as a potential source of rights, an effort that has met with some modest success. It receives support by the inclination of other courts to turn to international human rights conventions-even in nations where such conventions have not been ratified-as a kind of "best practice" in the area. The recent publication and subsequent ratification (though not, as of yet, by the United States) of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) may add new support to those using international human rights documents as a basis for litigating prisoners' rights claims. To the best of our knowledge, there has, as of yet, been no scholarly literature on the question of the implications of the CRPD on the state of prisoners' rights law in a U.S. domestic context. In this article, we raise this question, and offer some tentative conclusions.

Applying Differential Coercion and Social Support Theory to Prison Organizations

The Importance of Social Support and Coercion to Risk of Impulsivity and Juvenile Offending

The Effects of Procedural Justice on Cooperation and Compliance among Inmates in a Work Release Program

Dynamics of Social Capital of Prisoners and Community Reentry: Ties That Bind?

Where “Old Heads” Prevail: Inmate Hierarchy in a Men’s Prison Unit

Do Perceptions of Legitimacy and Fairness Matter in Prison? Examining How Procedural and Distributive Justice Relate to Misconduct

Gang organization and violence in youth correctional facilities

A Test of Job Demands-Resources Theory: Organizational Citizenship Behavior in a Carceral Setting

An Examination of Prison-Based Programming and Prison Misconduct

When goals diverge: Staff consensus and the organizational climate

The Association Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Trust Among Correctional Staff

A Good Place to Do Time? Detailing the Construction of Symbolic Social Boundaries in Correctional Boot Camps

"It's doom alone that counts": can international human rights law be an effective source of rights in correctional conditions litigation?

Toward a Criminology of Inmate Networks

Canadian correctional officers, institutionalization, and the social impacts of prison work

Inclusionary control? Theorizing the effects of penal voluntary organizations’ work

The Path of Least Desistance: Inmate Compliance and Recidivism

Spatial Distance, Community Disadvantage, and Racial and Ethnic Variation in Prison Inmate Access to Social Ties

The Strain From Procedural Injustice on Parolees: Bridging Procedural Justice Theory and General Strain Theory

Sex Differences in the Effects of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Institutional Misconduct among Adults in Prison

A sociological perspective on public support for capital punishment.