Spinosad resistance in field populations of melon fly, Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett), in Hawaii

Ju‐Chun Hsu,Ming‐Yi Chou,Ronald FL Mau,Colby Maeda,Ikkei Shikano,Nicholas C Manoukis,Roger I Vargas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6583
IF: 4.462
2021-08-13
Pest Management Science
Abstract:BACKGROUNDControl of Zeugodacus cucurbitae, a serious agricultural pest worldwide, often includes or is dependent on the use of spinosad-based insecticides. This is especially the case in Hawaii, where GF-120, a protein bait containing spinosad as the active ingredient, has been in use as a key IPM tool against this Tephritid for the last two decades. Here, we report on resistance to spinosad (resistance ratios and LD50) in Hawaii's populations of Z. cucurbitae. RESULTSHigh resistance was found in populations from three farms on Oahu (RR=102-303; LC50=191-567 mg/L) and in a population from Maui (RR=8.50; LC50=15.9 mg/L). These will be problematic for control given that the most concentrated dilution ratio on the GF-120 label is 96 mg/L of spinosad (1 part GF-120 to 1.5 parts water). Background resistance in a naïve wild population from Hawaii island (RR=2.73; LC50=5.1 mg/L) was relatively low compared with a spinosad-susceptible lab colony (LC50=1.87 mg/L). Resistance in the three Oahu and one Maui populations declined over generations in the absence of spinosad but remained elevated in some cases. Moreover, melon flies collected from one of the Oahu farms one year after the cessation of spinosad use revealed high persistence of resistance. CONCLUSIONCompared with a 2008 survey of spinosad resistance, our findings indicate a 34-fold increase in resistance on one of the Oahu farms over 9 years. The evolution and persistence of high levels of resistance to spinosad in Z. cucurbitae in Hawaii highlights the need for alternative control tactics, particularly rotation of active ingredients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
entomology,agronomy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?