Abstract:CONSPECTUS: In structure-based drug design, scoring functions are widely used for fast evaluation of protein-ligand interactions. They are often applied in combination with molecular docking and de novo design methods. Since the early 1990s, a whole spectrum of protein-ligand interaction scoring functions have been developed. Regardless of their technical difference, scoring functions all need data sets combining protein-ligand complex structures and binding affinity data for parametrization and validation. However, data sets of this kind used to be rather limited in terms of size and quality. On the other hand, standard metrics for evaluating scoring function used to be ambiguous. Scoring functions are often tested in molecular docking or even virtual screening trials, which do not directly reflect the genuine quality of scoring functions. Collectively, these underlying obstacles have impeded the invention of more advanced scoring functions.In this Account, we describe our long-lasting efforts to overcome these obstacles, which involve two related projects. On the first project, we have created the PDBbind database. It is the first database that systematically annotates the protein-ligand complexes in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with experimental binding data. This database has been updated annually since its first public release in 2004. The latest release (version 2016) provides binding data for 16 179 biomolecular complexes in PDB. Data sets provided by PDBbind have been applied to many computational and statistical studies on protein-ligand interaction and various subjects. In particular, it has become a major data resource for scoring function development. On the second project, we have established the Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions (CASF) benchmark for scoring function evaluation. Our key idea is to decouple the "scoring" process from the "sampling" process, so scoring functions can be tested in a relatively pure context to reflect their quality. In our latest work on this track, i.e. CASF-2013, the performance of a scoring function was quantified in four aspects, including "scoring power", "ranking power", "docking power", and "screening power". All four performance tests were conducted on a test set containing 195 high-quality protein-ligand complexes selected from PDBbind. A panel of 20 standard scoring functions were tested as demonstration. Importantly, CASF is designed to be an open-access benchmark, with which scoring functions developed by different researchers can be compared on the same grounds. Indeed, it has become a popular choice for scoring function validation in recent years.Despite the considerable progress that has been made so far, the performance of today's scoring functions still does not meet people's expectations in many aspects. There is a constant demand for more advanced scoring functions. Our efforts have helped to overcome some obstacles underlying scoring function development so that the researchers in this field can move forward faster. We will continue to improve the PDBbind database and the CASF benchmark in the future to keep them as useful community resources.

Featurization strategies for protein–ligand interactions and their applications in scoring function development

From machine learning to deep learning: Advances in scoring functions for protein–ligand docking

Can Machine Learning Consistently Improve the Scoring Power of Classical Scoring Functions? Insights into the Role of Machine Learning in Scoring Functions.

Accuracy or novelty: what can we gain from target-specific machine-learning-based scoring functions in virtual screening?

A Generalized Protein-Ligand Scoring Framework with Balanced Scoring, Docking, Ranking and Screening Powers.

Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using Structure-based Deep Learning: A Review

Computational representations of protein–ligand interfaces for structure-based virtual screening

Modern machine‐learning for binding affinity estimation of protein–ligand complexes: Progress, opportunities, and challenges

Surface-based multimodal protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

Machine‐learning scoring functions for structure‐based drug lead optimization

A Small Step Toward Generalizability: Training a Machine Learning Scoring Function for Structure-Based Virtual Screening

SMPLIP-Score: predicting ligand binding affinity from simple and interpretable on-the-fly interaction fingerprint pattern descriptors

Protein–Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era

Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-LigandInteraction Scoring Functions

iScore: A ML-Based Scoring Function for Drug Discovery

Improving Structure-Based Virtual Screening Performance Via Learning from Scoring Function Components

TB-IECS: an accurate machine learning-based scoring function for virtual screening

Empirical Scoring Functions for Affinity Prediction of Protein‐ligand Complexes

Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Drug Discoveries from Experimental and Computer-Generated Protein-Ligand Structures: Towards Per-Target Scoring Functions

ML-PLIC: a web platform for characterizing protein–ligand interactions and developing machine learning-based scoring functions

Improving protein–ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term