Problematic issues of perception of electronic money in the legislation of Ukraine

M.V. Starynskyi,G.V. Bilyk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/legalhorizons.2020.i25.p91
2020-01-01
Legal horizons
Abstract:The article deals with the peculiarities of legal regulation of e-cash cycle in Ukraine. It is emphasized here that e-cash is the result of technological development in our society, what enlarges greatly the opportunities of economic agents in their activity. In particular, its ease of use, reduction of transaction expenses, absence of exact regulation on the part of the state are all those reasons for the e-cash to be used so intensively. The above-mentioned advantages also cause an increased interest towards the ecash shown by the persons, whose purpose does not coincide with the law enforcement system existing on the territory of the country. The anonymity of use promotes the application of the e-cash for money laundering, financing of terrorism, weapon trade and other activities that harm the development of modern civilization. With this in mind, almost every state tries to regulate the activity connected with the use of e-cash and make sure the agents that use it contribute to the development of the country and its economy. Based on the analysis of both the legislation currently in effect in Ukraine and the best international practices of legal regulation of e-cash cycle, the authors of the article draw the following conclusions. Though the effective legislation of Ukraine includes a definition of e-cash, the latter does not reflect the essence of this phenomenon since the definition admits the functioning of different e-cash types but fails to take into consideration their peculiar features. Realizing the whole difficulty of e-cash nature and essence as a novel financial instrument, the authors tend to share the opinion that on the current stage of e-cash development it is impossible to provide its general comprehensive definition. Attention should be paid to the regulation of the e-cash that is most popular and widely used. At the same time the regulation of e-cash cycle administrators deserves special attention since it will help take its cycle and the volumes of e-cash transaction under at least partial control. Taking into account the position of Ukraine in relation to e-cash cycle, namely its narrow perception as an electronic payment means that only banking institutions are permitted to issue, the legislation currently in effect should use clearly defined terms and not equate e-cash as units of value that are kept in an electronic device, accepted as a payment means by other persons than the one that issues them, are pecuniary liabilities of this person and can be used both on a cash and non-cash basis, with other types of virtual currencies. The authors believe that some generalizing definitions of electronic currencies should be removed from the legislation currently in effect and in the future, when enacting new bills, some regulatory acts must be created that would establish the difference between such terms as “e-cash” and “virtual currency”.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?