12. Intensive Animal Farming and Moral Status

William Abel,Elizabeth Kahn,Tom Parr,Andrew Walton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198783275.003.0012
2021-02-18
Abstract:This chapter studies which principles should govern the state’s regulation of the treatment of non-human animals raised for human consumption. It defends the claim that it is wrong to inflict pain on or to kill animals, and that the state should prohibit intensive animal farming on these bases. The chapter then considers the objection that there is no moral duty to act in this way because animals are not part of the relevant community of moral concern. It demonstrates that it is implausible to restrict the scope of moral duties in this way. Finally, the chapter explores the claim that it would be wrong for the state to enforce compliance with these duties, but it contends that limiting the state’s role in this way leads to various implausible conclusions regarding how it should regulate the treatment of both animals and humans.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?