Abstract:This article provides an applied analysis of the social network technologies used by Western IT-companies to exert a direct or indirect influence on political processes. The study focuses on a set of tools that were employed to shape the media landscape during the 2020 presidential election campaign in the United States. Overall, the empirical observations suggest that the largest networking services (such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, YouTube, etc.) more or less contributed to the success of the Democratic candidate. Having studied the relevant U.S. experience, the authors identify a set of manipulative techniques used by social network administrators to form specific electoral attitudes among users. These include blocking accounts; setting up search algorithms to produce pre-programmed results; labeling ideologically objectionable materials as “fake”, “untrustworthy”, “manipulative” and “potentially dangerous”; automatically recommending certain materials for viewing; and removing or pessimizing unwanted content. Seeking to expand their own audience, social networks flood the media space with so-called “partisan” content, which is vigorously welcomed by one part of society and just as vigorously rejected by another. This leads to polarization and radicalization of the masses. The most destructive consequences of this process can be witnessed in the United States, where Democrat and Republican supporters become not just political opponents but real antagonists. Social media, search engines and news aggregators, developing their capacity as political actors, pave the way to a qualitative change in the established electoral practices. The greatest concern is the ability of IT-companies to manipulate the political consciousness and behavior of citizens during crucial election campaigns. Considering this circumstance, the authors raise a question about the need to regulate the political and communication processes unfolding on the Internet platforms.

US Digital Nationalism: A Habermasian Critical Discourse Analysis of Trump’s ‘Fake News’ Approach to the First Amendment

Populism, Fake News, and the Flight From Democracy

Civility, Subversion and Technocratic Class Consciousness: Reconstituting Truth in the Journalistic Field

Disintermediation and disinformation as a political strategy: use of AI to analyse fake news as Trump’s rhetorical resource on Twitter

Digital Authoritarianism as a Modern Threat to Democratic Stability: Restriction of Freedom or Network Politicization?

Fringe News Networks: Dynamics of US News Viewership following the 2020 Presidential Election

Opening or Impasse? Critical Media Literacy Pedagogy in a Posttruth Era

China Dealing with the Impact of Fake News : Roles of Governments in the “Post-truth” Predicament

Spreadable Spectacle in Digital Culture: Civic Expression, Fake News, and the Role of Media Literacies in “Post-Fact” Society

Modern technologies of social management in the US political process (using the example of the 2020 presidential election campaign)

Information disorder, fake news and the future of democracy

Counter acts: practices of 'anti-anti racism' in France and the USA

Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Fake News: How Social Media Conditions Individuals to Be Less Critical of Political Misinformation

No Grand Pronouncements Here...: Reflections on Cancel Culture and Digital Media Participation

Othering as soft-power discursive practice: China Daily’s construction of Trump’s America in the 2016 presidential election

A Disinformation-Misinformation Ecology: The Case of Trump

The Learning Sciences in a New Era of U.S. Nationalism

Online Political Discourse in the Trump Era

Digital Authoritarianism: Conceptual Foundations and a Model of Legitimation

Parenting a New Moral Panic: Anti-Queer Digital Activism and Reactionary Media Ecologies

Digital diplomacy of USA and China in the era of datalization