Abstract:European Journal of International Relations, Ahead of Print. Militarily aggressive actions by Russia and China in recent years have sparked a debate among foreign policy commentators regarding the utility of spheres of influence, even as International Relations (IR) scholars have continued to neglect the phenomenon. This article tests three rival theories that attempt to explain the spheres of influence behavior of great powers. Structural realism proposes that a great power will cede a small power to the sphere of a rival that possesses a stronger material interest in the small power and is a peer competitor, and that a consequent rupture or crisis in the sphere will lead the great power to engage in vigorous but restricted cooperation with the restive small power that maintains the previously granted sphere. Ideological distance theory (IDT) hypothesizes that a great power will steadfastly oppose ceding an ideologically homogeneous small power to the sphere of an ideologically divergent peer competitor, and that a rupture in a previously granted sphere will result in noncooperation between the great power grantor and restive small power if they are ideologically heterogeneous. I introduce a third approach, modified ideological distance theory (MIDT), which predicts that a great power will temporarily oppose ceding an ideologically homogeneous small power to the sphere of an ideologically divergent peer competitor, and will engage in delayed and attenuated cooperation with an ideologically heterogeneous small power following a rupture in a peer competitor's sphere. Examination of the United States' relationship with Yugoslavia (1948–1955) and the Soviet Union's relationship with Cuba (1960–1962) demonstrates MIDT's explanatory superiority.

Strange Bedfellows: The Strategic Dynamics of Major Power Military Interventions

Do Major-Power Interventions Encourage the Onset of Civil Conflict? A Structural Analysis

America'S Military Interventionism: A Social Evolutionary Interpretation

External Threats and Military Intervention: The United States and the Caribbean Basin

Between indifference and coercion: Third-party intervention techniques in ongoing disputes

Empirical Support for Systemic and Dyadic Explanations of International Conflict

Conflict or Cooperation: A Survival Analysis of the Relationship between Regional Trade Agreements and Military Conflict

Beyond the enemy image and spiral model: cognitive–strategic research after the cold war

Rivalry intervention in civil conflicts: Afghanistan (India–Pakistan), Angola (USSR–USA), and Lebanon (Israel–Syria)

Dynamic Stochastic Blockmodel Regression for Network Data: Application to International Militarized Conflicts

Intervention by invitation and collective self-defence: two sides of the same coin?

Alliances and Conflict, or Conflict and Alliances? Appraising the Causal Effect of Alliances on Conflict

Third-Party Intervention of Cooperation in Multilayer Networks

Mediation, Military, and Money: The Promises and Pitfalls of Outside Interventions to End Armed Conflicts

Reluctant allies: system-unit dynamics and China-Russia relations

Market Power Politics

Interests, power, and multilateralism

The Democratic Politics of Military Interventions

European Intervention:A Multi-perspective Analysis

Triangulating War: Network Structure and the Democratic Peace

Interests, ideologies, and great power spheres of influence