Abstract:Purpose The role of big data and data analytics in the audit engagement process is evident. Notwithstanding, understanding how big data influences cognitive processes and, consequently, on the auditors’ judgment decision-making process is limited. The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual framework on the cognitive process that may influence auditors’ judgment decision-making in the big data environment. The proposed framework predicts the relationships among data visualization integration, data processing modes, task complexity and auditors’ judgment decision-making. Design/methodology/approach The methodology to accomplish the conceptual framework is based on a thorough literature review that consists of theoretical discussions and comparative studies of other authors’ works and thinking. It also involves summarizing and interpreting previous contributions subjectively and narratively and extending the work in some fashion. Based on this approach, this paper formulates four propositions about data visualization integration, data processing modes, task complexity and auditors’ judgment decision-making. The proposed framework was built from cognitive theory addressing how auditors process data into useful information to make judgment decision-making. Findings The proposed framework expects that the cognitive process of data visualization integration and intuitive data processing mode will improve auditors’ judgment decision-making. This paper also contends that task complexity may influence the cognitive process of data visualization integration and processing modes because of the voluminous nature of data and the complexity of business processes. Hence, it is also expected that the relationships between data visualization integration and audit judgment decision-making and between processing mode and audit judgment decision-making will be moderated by task complexity. Research limitations/implications There is a dearth of studies examining how big data and big data analytics affect auditors’ cognitive processes in making decisions. This paper will help researchers and auditors understand the behavioral consequences of data visualization integration and data processing mode in making judgment decision-making, given a certain level of task complexity. Originality/value With the advent of big data and the evolution of innovative audit procedures, the constructed framework can be used as a theoretical foundation for future empirical studies concerning auditors’ judgment decision-making. It highlights the potential of big data to transform the nature and practice of accounting and auditing.

Thinking preferences as diagnostic and learning tools for managerial styles and predictors of auditor success

Cognitive Style Modulates Conscious but Not Unconscious Thought: Comparing the Deliberation-Without-attention Effect in Analytics and Wholists.

Investigating Managers' Fine-Grained Evaluation Processes In Organizations: Exploring Two Dual-Process Perspectives

Two minds and double entries: an application of cognitive psychology to corporate reporting

Factors influencing health practitioners’ cognitive processing and decision-making style

Unbending mind: Individuals with hoarding disorder do not modify decision strategy in response to feedback under risk

Effect of Different Types of Feedback on the Level of Auditors Configural Information Processing

Effect of Individual Thinking Styles on Item Selection During Study Time Allocation

An Examination of Factors Affecting Audit Practice Development

Culture, Thinking Styles and Investment Decision.

An Analysis of the Group Dynamics Surrounding Internal Control Assessment in Information Systems Audit and Assurance Domains

Improving Performance in Accounting: Evidence for Insisting on Cognitive Conflict Tasks

External auditors' willingness to rely on the work of internal auditors: The influence of work style and barriers to cooperation

Auditor judgment and decision-making in big data environment: a proposed research framework

Assessing the Impact of Student Learning Style Preferences

Individual Differences in Decision Making Depend on Cognitive Abilities, Monitoring and Control

Data Visualization and Cognitive Biases in Audits

Market Situation Interpretation and Response: The Role of Cognitive Style, Organizational Culture, and Information Use

The Role of Phenotypic Personality Traits as Dimensions of Decision-making Styles

Diagnostic decision-making and strategies to improve diagnosis

Study shows how cognitive style and personality of leaders determine what they are good at