Abstract:Abstract Background Data sharing is considered a crucial part of modern medical research. Unfortunately, despite its advantages, it often faces obstacles, especially data privacy challenges. As a result, various approaches and infrastructures have been developed that aim to ensure that patients and research participants remain anonymous when data is shared. However, privacy protection typically comes at a cost, e.g. restrictions regarding the types of analyses that can be performed on shared data. What is lacking is a systematization making the trade-offs taken by different approaches transparent. The aim of the work described in this paper was to develop a systematization for the degree of privacy protection provided and the trade-offs taken by different data sharing methods. Based on this contribution, we categorized popular data sharing approaches and identified research gaps by analyzing combinations of promising properties and features that are not yet supported by existing approaches. Methods The systematization consists of different axes. Three axes relate to privacy protection aspects and were adopted from the popular Five Safes Framework: (1) safe data, addressing privacy at the input level, (2) safe settings, addressing privacy during shared processing, and (3) safe outputs, addressing privacy protection of analysis results. Three additional axes address the usefulness of approaches: (4) support for de-duplication, to enable the reconciliation of data belonging to the same individuals, (5) flexibility, to be able to adapt to different data analysis requirements, and (6) scalability, to maintain performance with increasing complexity of shared data or common analysis processes. Results Using the systematization, we identified three different categories of approaches: distributed data analyses, which exchange anonymous aggregated data, secure multi-party computation protocols, which exchange encrypted data, and data enclaves, which store pooled individual-level data in secure environments for access for analysis purposes. We identified important research gaps, including a lack of approaches enabling the de-duplication of horizontally distributed data or providing a high degree of flexibility. Conclusions There are fundamental differences between different data sharing approaches and several gaps in their functionality that may be interesting to investigate in future work. Our systematization can make the properties of privacy-preserving data sharing infrastructures more transparent and support decision makers and regulatory authorities with a better understanding of the trade-offs taken.

Data quality for federated medical data lakes

A Federated Learning Framework Via Decentralized Data Valuation for Chronic Disease Healthcare

Report on Data Quality in Biobanks: Problems, Issues, State-of-the-Art

Sharing sensitive data in life sciences: an overview of centralized and federated approaches

A Lakehouse Architecture for the Management and Analysis of Heterogeneous Data for Biomedical Research and Mega-biobanks

Privacy-preserving data sharing infrastructures for medical research: systematization and comparison

Data quality and Big Data in the health industry: a scoping review protocol

A novel framework for assessing metadata quality in epidemiological and public health research settings

Developing a Data Element Repository to Support EHR-driven Phenotype Algorithm Authoring and Execution

Assessing The Practice Of Data Quality Evaluation In A National Clinical Data Research Network Through A Systematic Scoping Review In The Era Of Real-World Data

From Planning Stage Towards FAIR Data: A Practical Metadatasheet For Biomedical Scientists

CollectionLocator Level 1: Metadata-Based Search for Collections in Federated Biobanks

From Planning Stage To FAIR Data: A Practical Metadatasheet For Biomedical Scientists

The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: a systematic review

Can I trust my fake data – A comprehensive quality assessment framework for synthetic tabular data in healthcare

Quality medical data management within an open AI architecture – cancer patients case

Detecting Quality Problems in Research Data: A Model-Driven Approach

Metadata Systems for Data Lakes: Models and Features

Unlocking the potential of big data and AI in medicine: insights from biobanking

On the Logical Design of a Prototypical Data Lake System for Biological Resources