DOCUMENTARY REPRODUCTION

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/157029a0
IF: 64.8
1946-01-01
Nature
Abstract:THE article on documentary reproduction as an aid to science and learning which Mrs. Moholy contributes to this issue (p. 38) is concerned essentially with the potentialities of microfilm. The technique of microfilm had not been widely adopted in Britain up to the outbreak of war, although it was already being largely used in the United States, as Dr. L. A. Sayce indicated in his paper, “Micro-photography in 1939”, prepared for the sixteenth annual conference of the Association of Special Libraries and Information Bureaux. One reason for this lag in Britain-the absence of cheap and convenient viewing apparatus-was well brought out in the discussion on Dr. Sayce's paper, and the situation in this respect has not fundamentally changed in the intervening years. Moreover, even when-and if-a portable viewer meeting these requirements is available, microfilm will always be at a disadvantage compared with other processes of documentary reproduction, such as the photostat, where the research worker is concerned, because the microfilm copy cannot be taken away and read at home or where most convenient in the same way that the original or photostat copy can.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?