Upscaling of Foam Mobility Control to Three Dimensions

Busheng Li,George J. Hirasaki,Clarence A. Miller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/99719-ms

2006-04-22

Abstract:Abstract The applications of foam are 3-D on a field scale. However, most previous research focuses only on properties of foam in 1-D. Experiments were performed in 3-D, and the compositional reservoir simulator UTCHEM was modified to predict foam flow in 3-D. The 3-D experiments demonstrated that, under similar experimental conditions, the mobility of foam in a 3-D tank is greater than that in a 1-D column. They also showed that foam greatly increases lateral gas distribution along the bottom of the tank and the average gas saturation for both homogeneous and heterogeneous packings with the effects being significantly larger in the latter case. The reservoir simulator UTCHEM was modified for foam flow. The foam simulation parameters were measured in 1-D sand columns and the simulator was modified to match the 1-D and 3-D experiments. The proposed model successfully history matched the homogeneous and heterogeneous 3-D sand tank experimental results for average gas saturation, gas injection rate, gas distribution and pressure profile along the tank diagonal 6 inches from the bottom. The results of this study represent an advance in understanding of foam flow in 3-D. The simulator could be used to design a foam process in 3-D. Introduction Foam mobility difference in 1-D and 3-D. Foam is used for mobility control in aquifer remediation processes[1–4] and oil recovery operations.[5–8] Gas has low density and viscosity compared to other fluids like oil and water. So when gas is injected into the porous media, the gravity force will dominate its flow and the injected gas will tend to flow directly to the top of the porous media, results in a poor gas sweep in the horizontal direction along the bottom (Fig. 1). Foam can reduce the mobility of gas by reducing the relative permeability and increasing the apparent viscosity thus increasing the gas sweep efficiency. However, though there were some field applications of foam, most of the previous laboratory researches on foam were in 1-D. The properties of 3-D foam have not been investigated yet. Tanzil[9] observed that the apparent viscosity of foam is greater in 3-D than in 1-D. His observation was based on a rough comparison between a 3-D field scale foam application and some 1-D column experiments in lab. No strict experiments were performed by him to demonstrate the difference between 1-D and 3-D. Nevertheless, the observed mobility difference of foam between 1-D and 3-D revealed how much error would result if one uses 1-D column foam experimental results to predict 3-D field application results. A foam simulation model developed from 1-D experimental results would not be applicable to simulate 3-D foam results. 3-D foam experiments are important for us to understand the flow properties of foam and a simulation model is also indispensable to simulate and predict 3-D foam flow behavior considering the complexity and difficulty of performing 3-D foam experiments in lab.