Abstract:SOME correspondence has recently appeared in the Morning Post under the title that stands at the head of this article. Lt.-Col. J. W. Barret, of the Australian Army, a Melbourne doctor, well known for his active participation in the educational world there, writing respectfully of British men of science, laments their exclusiveness. They are, he implies, too much dominated by the idea of studentship; they regard the sphere of science too much as that of the laboratory and the academy; they do not acknowledge brotherhood with men in the greater world, who, in the spirit of enterprise and with the kind of method that prevail in conventional science, are solving great problems of industry, commerce, and national development. Another writer goes further, and would hail as a brother in science the man who elucidates the authorship of Shakespeare's plays or the technique of an old master. It is not proposed here to enter upon a discussion of the legitimate use of the term science. We may be all for brotherhood, but the circumstances of life compel us largely to separate into groups for purposes of action, and there can be no real complaint if the word science is used in a restricted sense for what is perhaps better called natural science. This should not prevent men of science from recognising their kinship with all faithful workers for the elucidation of truth, in whatever sphere'of action. Let us avoid a controversy about mere words. “Lt.-Col. Barret's complaint is a more substantial one-not one of terminology. It is essentially ' this, that when operations relating to the forces of nature transcend a certain scale they are no longer recognised as science, and that men of science in the limited sense thus lose a great companionship and an invaluable link with the greater world. He gives as an illustration the work of a railroad president whose operations “involve the placing of towns and even cities in new positions, the reorganisation of the agricultural education of districts, the estimation of future markets, and other complicated actions involving scientific imagination of the first order.” It is probable that most men of science would; readily admit that some solid advantages would be gained by having in their camp these great operators, with all their intellectual energy, their enterprise and their influence, and perhaps many would admit their claim to inclusion. There is undoubtedly a tendency for an increased scale of operations to remove a man from the scientific class if he was once In it, or to prevent his accession if he did not originally enter through the usual portal. The case may be well illustrated from engineering. A scientifically trained engineer who betakes himself to great problems of engineering, constructing some almost impossible railway or irrigating a whole parched province of India, seems to be moving away from science. An engineer who has acquired such powers without having received the hall-mark of formal scien tific training, will find it hard to get his place acknowledged in the ranks of science. We may ask, What is really'at the bottom of this? Is it merely narrow-mindedness, or is there something more excusable? It is pleasant to think that there may be. Scientific men in their most august society are banded together “ for the improvement of natural knowledge.” They are by implication a body of students working in the temple of Nature for truth's sake alone, heedless of the world and its rewards. What they garner is their gift to the world: they fill another page in the Revelation that brings men nearer to the angels. Let a man wander into the world with his science as wares to sell for money profit, and he has passed from the true brotherhood. Surely this idea, perhaps here rather fancifully stated, is at the bottom of much of our exclusiveness. It is certainly expressed very often in the privacy of small deliberative councils and in personal intercourse, and it is strongly, though silently, operative in the outer world. If this were the chief reason for the detachment of men of science we should have to ask whether it be really good and sufficient. That it has elements of good in it, no one would deny. There should be much strength in the union of disinterested people, and the flame of disinterested-- that is, unworldly-study is the most sacred light of knowledge. But there is this great fact of history and actuality against an austere brotherhood: natural science has had its roots in the practical avocations of mankind, and from them it has received its chief stimulus. The application of science to the practical arts has not more benefited them than it has benefited science. In this place it is unnecessary to illustrate or amplify the argument. It is therefore not only not unbecoming, but it is vitally necessary that the improvement of natural knowledge should be bound up with solving the problems of the busy world, and the man of science who looks with any kind of disdain oh those who are engaged in solving these problems, be they labelled brewer, baker, or candle-stick maker and be they incidentally making fortunes, is despising his best friends and declaring himself a pedant. As a matter of fact this disdain does linger. .It is the inevitable product of the seminary; it. is the fatuity of the cloister, arising, no doubt, from the theological beginnings of our educational system-this notion of keeping science unspotted fro.ni the world. It has much to answer for. The neglfet of applied science-what is it not meaning now in- the fortunes of our nation ! It is comfortable for us to blame anyone but ourselves. Have we not long proclaimed the vital importance of science for the service of industry and the State? Industry and the State are doubtless much to blame, but surely no fair-minded person would say that the scientific world is exempt. Rather let us acknowledge that Lt.-Col. Barret is in essence right; the scientific world has been too exclusive; it has not bound itself as much as it might have done to great workers in the world, whose tasks, if not the same, are much akin to those of the laboratory, men whose sympathies, already scientific, would be strengthened by association and make broad channels for the flow of science into practice. Scientific men, we must admit, have often no conception of the real, environment and problems of the industrialist; of the accumulated store of empirical knowledge from which he must select what is needed; of the skill and design with which he must apply it under the limitations imposed by men, material, and markets. They too often underrate the extent and importance of what may be called technological science and the new horizons that it opens. The technologist is often ignorantly set in the outer courts of learning; he is not quite of the elect, and antipathies arise. How much have we not sacrificed of the acceptance and efficacy of science in industry by offering- young men trained in pure science and knowing nothing of manufacture, to employers trained in manufacture and knowing nothing of science, relying wholly on the manufacturer for a most difficult and precarious adjustment? The management of our applied science has become one of the great problems of the day, and it brings with it great difficulties. Spurious technology is a hateful make-believe that has already wrought much mischief; a man, however scientific, wholly on the make-to use a concise vulgar term for a vulgar condition-is an unedifying spectacle. But it does not follow that because a man is preoccupied with industrial problems he shall lose his scientific virtue or that his achievements, however remunerative, should rank on a lower plane. It is not so difficult to distinguish the genuine from the base among scientific workers wherever they may be engaged. We must strengthen the bonds between science and industry by something more than an appeal to the pocket. A real sympathy and interest must be created on both sides; we must open our arms wider. Even if we find difficulty in discovering, in this country, the type of railway president described by Lt.-Col. Barret, there are yet many men in our world of industry and in the service of the State who, without any list of scientific memoirs to their name, have yet been potent in the service of science, and would be more potent still if they were brought more into companionship with the scientific world. The Royal Society has the power of admitting to its ranks at the rate of one each year “persons, who in their opinion have either rendered conspicuous service to the cause of science or are such that their election would be of signal benefit to the Society.” Here at least is a limited opportunity of doing something towards introducing into the circle of science the sort of men whose influence might help towards bringing about the reform to which we are bidden by a candid friend.. In any of the new associations that are contemplated for giving science its right place in our national life we shall surely do well to cast our net widely and to extend our outlook beyond'the conventional circumference of what have usually been deemed scientific circles.

Abstract:MEN of science have thus far regarded the South Kensington Exhibitions of the last two years with very languid interest, if not with some suspicion. There has been throughout some show of scientific intent and much promise of serious result. Needless to say, however, that in regard to the Fisheries Exhibition, whatever may be in store for the future, very little of what was promised of solid or scientific result has thus far been definitely realised. That Exhibition achieved a certain success in technical interest and much was hoped in financial result, but there has been a remarkable reticence in respect to the surplus obtained and its proposed disposal. Little, if anything, has been announced in reply to the urgent requests that have been put forward for information on this subject as to the promotion of new knowledge which should aid the protection of the harvest of the sea, or help to give us information, of which we stand sadly in need, as to the best means of favouring the growth and hindering the destruction of the marine staple of food. So far the Marine Biological Association, which has been started by voluntary effort, has not received any promise of or share in the large sum of money which must now be standing to the credit of the Fisheries' Council. That body are in the happy position of having a continuing receipt as lessors of the buildings just vacated by the International Health Exhibition; they will receive a handsome sum for the next two years at least, and probably also in the succeeding years, from the Exhibitions already planned and in course of arrangement. They have a future before them rich in golden promise, and it is much to be hoped that they will not be unmindful of the new Marine Association. The Council of the International Health Exhibition have been more prompt in declaring the results of their work and in announcing some of its probable issues. Of this Exhibition also it was said, while its doors were open, that the element of display and of public attraction appeared to be much more prominent than did the scientific and solid objects which the great body of busy chemists, sanitarians, and engineers were summoned to assist by their work on the General Committees and on the juries. It will be found, however, by the statement which Mr. Ernest Hart makes in another column of the work done and the results achieved, that, although the serious side of the Exhibition was much less a subject of comment than its more entertaining features, the Council have steadily held the former in view and are likely still to do so in the proposed disposal of the surplus in promoting solid objects of national importance. In this Exhibition for the first time the Council went outside the ordinary routine of exhibits obtained from commercial or speculative sources, and at their own cost brought together and created departments of which the object was purely educational. Thus on the sanitary and unsanitary houses there appears to have been expended nearly 1000l., and probably much more than that on the literature of the Exhibition, including a considerable series of hand-books by skilled persons, devoted to the popular exposition of public and private hygiene, and the reports of conferences and lectures. A library was brought together of sanitary and educational works— about five thousand in number. Although far from complete, it was in many departments, especially in those relating to civic, official, and foreign sanitation, more extensive than any that had yet been collected. Of this an excellent printed catalogue was prepared, which is of itself a useful book of reference. Besides this, and perhaps far more important, was the creation of two health laboratories, under the direction of Profs. Corfield and Cheyne. By special application to the French Government a full exhibit was also obtained, illustrating the nature of the work and showing the instruments employed by M. Pasteur and M. Mique in their respective institutes. It is well known that laboratories of this kind are especially important for the scientific study of the bacteriological problems which have to be worked out, and which form the basis of the most important public health researches of the present day. The scheme which was presented to the Council in the early days of its work for the formation of these laboratories contemplated the creation of temporary laboratories, which should be put in working order and should demonstrate the nature of the work carried on in such laboratories, and its close and immediate connection with the interests of the health of man, and with investigations of high commercial value to every department of agriculture, and with the study of the costly epizootics which affect the prosperity of the grazing interest and influence of the food-supply of the nation. These laboratories have been in every sense successful. We have already noticed with satisfaction the paragraph in the report which the Council presented on the closing day of the Exhibition, in which they referred to a proposition that had been laid before them for establishing these health laboratories on a permanent footing as the best possible application of the surplus. The amount of that surplus has not yet been determined, and it is premature to speculate upon it. There is reason to fear that it will be much less than has been publicly rumoured. We have seen it anticipated in print that it will amount to nearly 30,000l. On the other hand, we have it on good authority that it is not likely to exceed half that sum. However this may be, it is satisfactory that the address, of which we print a part, and which has a semi-official value, coming from a member of the Executive Council, with the Chairman of the Council presiding, adverts to this application of the surplus almost as though it were a settled matter. Mr. Ernest Hart may of course speak with some excessive hope, inasmuch as it is known that the first establishment of these laboratories was due to his efforts, and they were formed upon the scheme which he drew up for the purpose. The proposition for making them permanent proceeds comes also from him, and no doubt he has a paternal hopefulness which may be excessive. There is, however, evident reason for accepting this most desirable application of the funds as the most probable issue, seeing that the Duke of Buckingham so heartily indorsed it in his speech at the Society of Arts at the close of the address, and that Sir Frederick Abel, also a member of the Exhibition Council, and not likely to speak with other than official caution, stated that Mr. Hart's scheme had now obtained, he believed, a pretty unanimous consensus of opinion in the Council. Outside, opinion has at once declared itself with strong approval of this application of the funds, and it is indeed evident that, if the Council can succeed in establishing health laboratories which shall find for the health students of this country establishments properly equipped such as those of Pasteur, Koch, and Miquel, the Exhibition will not have lived its short life in vain, but will leave behind it an institution not only of permanent value but of growing importance and of large promise. The Commissioners of 1851 will certainly see with great satisfaction this liberal intention of the Executive Council of the Health Exhibition to add to those laboratories which they have already provided one which is so greatly needed to complete the means of study and of education which South Kensington supplies in other departments of technical and biological research and teaching. They will probably make no difficulty—or, rather, they will have the strongest reason which a desire for national usefulness will give them to overcome any difficulty—in providing a suitable site for such laboratories. Even if the means which the surplus may provide should not be adequate for the establishment and endowment of such a laboratory, there is little doubt that, with this good beginning, so much may be effected as will afford the best possible reason and the largest inducement to societies such as the Royal Society, the British Medical Association, the British Association, and others to make grants to students conducting research in the laboratories. The Government can hardly refuse to make grants in aid of an institution which in any other country than this would be wholly supported by State funds-witness the health laboratories of France and Germany, which are liberally maintained by State endowments. In this country, however, we are accustomed to look to private enterprise, and the liberality of societies or committees, to furnish at least a large part of the funds required for scientific research or endowment, and it is satisfactory to know that the Council of the International Health Exhibition have favourably considered the proposition that they should take the first step in this useful direction. Every one interested in the promotion of real health-progress will trust that it will soon be an accomplished fact.

News and Views

The Reform of the Man of Science

The British Science Guild

[Letters to Editor]

Science and the Community

Science in New South Wales

Scientific Research and Man-Power in the United States

Scientific Civil Service : Promotion of Individual Research Workers

The Association of Teachers in Technical Institutions

Time for action: Science education for an alternative future

A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda

Elite science and the BBC: a 1950s contest of ownership

Science and the Planned State

Can science be planned? the controversy centering on Britain in the 1930s and 1940s

The Edinburgh University Festival

The Union of the Elementary Teaching of Science and Mathematics

Social Implications of Engineering

Health Laboratories as the Result of the Health Exhibition

The Science Museum, South Kensington

World Mineral Resources and Post-War Needs

Help wanted, scientists need apply