Diagnostic Role of Plasma ORM2 in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Study

Yuqiu Ge,Qiong Ouyang,Bin Xu,Hongzhou Cai,Wentao Xing,Qinbo Yuan,Xu Li,Yuanming Fan,Yang Shen,Qianqian Shi,Li Cui,Xiaojian Yin,Gaoxiang Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3883215
2021-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Background: Markers are needed to increase the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer (PCa) screening. Mounting evidence has shown that plasma proteins can be hopeful biomarkers for cancer diagnosis.Methods: Tandem mass tag (TMT)-based proteomics and parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) analysis were used to screen the differential proteins and further validated in four independent studies (n=791). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), decision curves and nomograms were applied to assess the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers.Findings: Three candidate proteins (DBP, LCAT and ORM2) were preliminarily screened. Subsequent validation studies revealed significant upregulation of ORM2 in PCa patients across 4 independent cohorts. ORM2 yielded excellent discriminative power for PCa from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients (AUC=0.861 and 0.814 in validation phases 2a and 2b, respectively), with a slightly decreased performance in distinguishing PCa from healthy controls (AUC=0.652 and 0.626 in phases 3a and 3b). Importantly, the combination of ORM2 and PSA gave better predictive accuracy than PSA alone. We incorporated age, PSA and ORM2 into a nomogram, which yielded c-indices of 0.883 in validation phase 2a and 0.922 in phase 2b.Interpretation: Our study suggests that ORM2 could be treated as a complementary biomarker for PSA in PCa detection.Funding: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20190600; BK20190555), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81903390; 81802880), and Huai’an City Science and Technology Project (HAB202051).Declaration of Interest: None to declare. Ethical Approval: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution. All participants provided their informed consent to participate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?