Abstract:The random utility maximization model is by far the most adopted framework to estimate consumer choice behavior. However, behavioral economics has provided strong empirical evidence of irrational choice behaviors, such as halo effects, that are incompatible with this framework. Models belonging to the random utility maximization family may therefore not accurately capture such irrational behavior. Hence, more general choice models, overcoming such limitations, have been proposed. However, the flexibility of such models comes at the price of increased risk of overfitting. As such, estimating such models remains a challenge. In this work, we propose an estimation method for the recently proposed generalized stochastic preference choice model, which subsumes the family of random utility maximization models and is capable of capturing halo effects. In particular, we propose a column-generation method to gradually refine the discrete choice model based on partially ranked preference sequences. Extensive computational experiments indicate that our model, explicitly accounting for irrational preferences, can significantly boost the predictive accuracy on both synthetic and real-world data instances. Summary of Contribution: In this work, we propose an estimation method for the recently proposed generalized stochastic preference choice model, which subsumes the family of random utility maximization models and is capable of capturing halo effects. Specifically, we show how to use partially ranked preferences to efficiently model rational and irrational customer types from transaction data. Our estimation procedure is based on column generation, where relevant customer types are efficiently extracted by expanding a treelike data structure containing the customer behaviors. Furthermore, we propose a new dominance rule among customer types whose effect is to prioritize low orders of interactions among products. An extensive set of experiments assesses the predictive accuracy of the proposed approach by comparing it against rank-based methods with only rational preferences and with more general benchmarks from the literature. Our results show that accounting for irrational preferences can boost predictive accuracy by 12.5% on average when tested on a real-world data set from a large chain of grocery and drug stores.

Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice

Mental accounting matters

Influences of mental accounting on consumption decisions: asymmetric effect of a scarcity mindset

Mental accounting, heuristics, and the second‐best: Solving the calculator‐jacket puzzle

Accounting for consumer choice: Inter-temporal decision making in behavioural perspective

Toward a positive theory of consumer choice

Hedonic Mental Accounting

Formal Choice Models in Marketing

Theoretical Behaviorism, Economic Theory, and Choice

Designing a Homo Psychologicus More Psychologicus: Empirical Results on Value Perception in Support to a New Theoretical Organizational-Economic Agent Based Model

Behavioral Economics: Past, Present and Future

The unified tradeoff model.

Rational Inattention as an Empirical Framework for Discrete Choice and Consumer-Welfare Evaluation

On the Estimation of Discrete Choice Models to Capture Irrational Customer Behaviors

A distributional and dynamic theory of pricing and preference.

Intertemporal Consumption With Anticipating, Remembering, And Experiencing Selves

Best Value, Price-Seeking, and Price Aversion: The Impact of Information and Learning on Consumer Choices

Social Networks and the Choices People Make

A Maximum Entropy Model of Bounded Rational Decision-Making with Prior Beliefs and Market Feedback

Assessing “Economic Value”

Revealed Statistical Consumer Theory