Abstract:Subpixel mapping (SPM) addresses the widespread mixed pixel problem in remote sensing images by predicting the spatial distribution of land cover within mixed pixels. However, conventional pixel-based spectral unmixing, a key pre-processing step for SPM, neglects valuable spatial contextual information and struggles with spectral variability, ultimately undermining SPM accuracy. Additionally, while extensively utilized, supervised spectral unmixing is labor-intensive and user-unfriendly. To address these issues, this paper proposes a fully automatic, unsupervised object-based SPM (UO-SPM) model that exploits object-scale information to reduce spectral unmixing errors and subsequently enhance SPM. Given that mixed pixels are typically located at the edges of objects (i.e., the inner part of objects is characterized by pure pixels), segmentation and morphological erosion are employed to identify pure pixels within objects and mixed pixels at the edges. More accurate endmembers are extracted from the identified pure pixels for the secondary spectral unmixing of the remaining mixed pixels. Experimental results on 10 study sites demonstrate that the proposed unsupervised object (UO)-based analysis is an effective model for enhancing both spectral unmixing and SPM. Specifically, the spectral unmixing results of UO show an average increase of 3.65 % and 1.09 % in correlation coefficient ( R ) compared to Fuzzy- C means (FCM) and linear spectral mixture model (LSMM)-derived coarse proportions, respectively. Moreover, the UO-derived results of four SPM methods (i.e., Hopfield neural network (HNN), Markov random field (MRF), pixel swapping (PSA) and radial basis function interpolation (RBF)) exhibit an average increase of 5.89 % and 3.04 % in overall accuracy (OA) across the four SPM methods and 10 study sites compared to the FCM and LSMM-based results, respectively. Moreover, the proportions of both mixed and pure pixels are more accurately predicted. The advantage of UO-SPM is more evident when the size of land cover objects is larger, benefiting from more accurate identification of objects.

Spectral–Spatial Fusion Sub-Pixel Mapping Based on Deep Neural Network

Deep Convolutional Neural Network Framework for Subpixel Mapping

Spnet: A Spectral Patching Network For End-To-End Hyperspectral Image Classification

Deep Spatial Feedback Refined Network With Multilevel Feature Fusion for Hyperspectral Image Subpixel Mapping

Hyperspectral and Multispectral Image Fusion Based on Deep Attention Network.

SSCU-Net: Spatial–Spectral Collaborative Unmixing Network for Hyperspectral Images

Nonlocal Spatial–Spectral Neural Network for Hyperspectral Image Denoising

Subpixel Mapping of Hyperspectral Image Based on Multiscale and Multifeature

SAWU-Net: Spatial Attention Weighted Unmixing Network for Hyperspectral Images

Subpixel Mapping Based on Multisource Remote Sensing Fusion Data for Land-Cover Classes

Spectral–Spatial Feature Extraction Network With SSM–CNN for Hyperspectral–Multispectral Image Collaborative Classification

Progressive Spatial Information-Guided Deep Aggregation Convolutional Network for Hyperspectral Spectral Super-Resolution

Multistage Spatial-Spectral Fusion Network for Spectral Super-Resolution

Hyperspectral-multispectral image fusion using subspace decomposition and Elastic Net Regularization

Learning Spatial-Spectral Prior for Super-Resolution of Hyperspectral Imagery

Unsupervised object-based spectral unmixing for subpixel mapping

Pixel-aware Deep Function-mixture Network for Spectral Super-Resolution

Spatial and Spectral Extraction Network With Adaptive Feature Fusion for Pansharpening

Spatial-Spectral Fusion by Combining Deep Learning and Variation Model

Unsupervised Hyperspectral and Multispectral Image Blind Fusion Based on Deep Tucker Decomposition Network with Spatial-Spectral Manifold Learning