Clinical and neuroscience evidence supports the critical importance of patient expectations and agency in opioid tapering

Beth D. Darnall,Howard L. Fields
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002443
IF: 7.926
2021-08-09
Pain
Abstract:In 2014, 11 million Americans were taking daily prescription opioids.29 However, because of widespread opioid addiction and overdose deaths, there is continuing controversy on the optimal use of opioid analgesics for chronic pain. In response to the tragic rise in opioid overdose deaths, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued the 2016 Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.14 Subsequently, opioid prescriptions dropped by as much as 57% per year (2016-2019).7 By 2017, about 23% of patients taking prescribed opioids were being tapered or discontinued.16 Although the most common rationales for discontinuing or dose reduction were that opioids were ineffective or had unacceptable side effects, the CDC cited 2 additional reasons: first, weak evidence for opioid efficacy beyond 3 months and, second, preclinical and human studies indicating that opioid exposure could result in hyperalgesia.5 Additional reasons for tapering include the risk of use disorder, overdose, and diversion.
neurosciences,clinical neurology,anesthesiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?