Abstract:Responsibility is a moral quality of caring that is central to child health policies. In contemporary United Kingdom these policies are based on behavioural psychology and underpinned by individualism, an ideology central to neoliberal governance. Amid the complexities of "obesity" and inequalities, there is a multi-layered stigmatisation of parents as moral associates. Few studies consider the lived realities of food policy processes from the standpoint of class. This critical qualitative research draws on theorists who explain processes of power and class: Foucault, Gramsci, Bourdieu, and Marx. Its objectives are: (a) to understand the lived experience of parents as they interact with food policy; (b) to explore how parents resist stigmatisation; and (c) to reflect on implications for policy and practice. Methods: Using purposive sampling, 31 ethnographically informed interviews were carried out in a London borough, with policy actors: policymakers, implementers, and parents as policy recipients, including 12 working-class mothers. Results: A core theme of "responsibilities" emerged with four interconnecting sub-processes that provide insight into how stigmatisation and resistance evolve through policy. Discussion: As have others, this study reveals the idea of responsibility as fundamental to the processes of soft power. Child health is a priority for participants and a "ruling idea." The diffusion of responsibility throughout policy leads to confusion about where it lies. New subjectivities are formed in line with ideas of governmentality. Parents engage with policy at multiple sites that elicit symbolic violence, and stigma sows social divisions. Against this background, working-class parents are left in a state of cognitive dissonance between being made responsible (responsibilisation), and feeling responsible (self-blaming) for their children's weight while lacking the material resources to provide an optimal nutritious diet. Resistance is interwoven and is essentially found in parents' policy alternatives that diverge from United Kingdom government policy. Conclusion: Critical qualitative research using multiple theorists is valuable in understanding how parents interact with policy in a complex social world. With United Kingdom policy failing, useful insights are provided into how involving parents in policymaking might determine a meaningful collective responsibility, with a political ethic of care and unity between parents that would advance health equity.

A Critical Analysis of Representations of Inequalities in Childhood Obesity in Australian Health Policy Documents

Public Health Interventions Against Childhood Obesity in China

The future of public health nutrition: a critical policy analysis of Eat Well Australia

Generating political priority for regulatory interventions targeting obesity prevention: an Australian case study

A scoping review of the role of policy in mitigating childhood obesity in underserved populations using the RE‐AIM framework

A description of health care system factors in the implementation of universal weight management services for children with overweight or obesity: case studies from Queensland and New South Wales, Australia

Obesity Prevention within the Early Childhood Education and Care Setting: A Systematic Review of Dietary Behavior and Physical Activity Policies and Guidelines in High Income Countries

"Eat Less, Exercise More": A Qualitative Study of Perspectives of Overweight Children and Their Parents on Weight Management in China

An analysis of potential barriers and enablers to regulating the television marketing of unhealthy foods to children at the state government level in Australia

The political construction of public health nutrition problems: a framing analysis of parliamentary debates on junk-food marketing to children in Australia

From childhood obesity risk to healthy growth in the U.S.: A 10-year social work research & policy update

Socioeconomic inequity in the utilization of healthcare among people with eating disorders in Australia

Understanding the dynamics of obesity prevention policy decision-making using a systems perspective: A case study of Healthy Together Victoria

Elucidating knowledge and beliefs about obesity and eating disorders among key stakeholders: paving the way for an integrated approach to health promotion

Childhood obesity: current literature, policy and implications for practice

Preventing childhood obesity in general practice: a qualitative study of GPs, practice nurses, and practice managers

Parents' perceptions of their child's weight among children in their first year of primary school: a mixed-methods analysis of an Australian cross-sectional (complete enumeration) study

[Obesity and intersectionality: critical analysis of narratives within public health policies in Brazil (2004-2021)]

Social Implications of Weight Bias Internalisation: Parents' Ultimate Responsibility as Consent, Social Division and Resistance

Childhood overweight and obesity abatement policies in Europe

An upstream approach to addressing the childhood obesity epidemic in New Zealand-a call to action