Comparative International Fisheries Management

Elizabeth R. DeSombre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197515037.013.2

2021-08-11

Abstract:High-seas fisheries are managed by a set of approximate 20 regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) that vary in terms of membership, structure, processes, and health of the stocks they manage. These RFMOs have tackled similar challenges in sometimes different and sometimes convergent ways, learning from each other and occasionally collaborating. This chapter gives an overview of the difficulties of international fisheries management; the primary regulatory approaches (and their evolution) in these organizations, such as voting rules and options to opt out of collective regulations; and the efforts to monitor and enforce rules that have been created. Individually and sometimes collectively RFMOs have worked to decrease the ability of states or vessels to fish outside of the regulatory process, including making it difficult for fish caught outside of RFMO rules to find markets, and they have increased the ability to monitor compliance. While some scholars argue that the regional nature of fisheries management causes problems and that there should be fewer organizations regulating international fisheries, RFMOs have resisted consolidation or management collaboration. Ultimately there is still much to be learned about the sources of effectiveness in management of high-seas fisheries.