Abstract:Using the endemic shrub Collaea cipoensis, we modeled an individual‐based network assessing the flower visitors' functional behavior and tested if plant centrality increases plant fitness. Antagonistic interactions were the most frequent in the network, primarily conducted by the nectar‐robbing bee Trigona spinipes, which was the detrimental antagonist. The hummingbirds Colibri serrirostris and Eupatomena macroura were the most efficient pollinators, with a high contribution to the floral visitation and the viable seeds, respectively. Many‐flowered plants boosted the plant's cohesion in the network and increased flower visitation. Our results reinforce the dynamic scenarios of flower–animal interactions, with consequences to plant reproductive ecology. Highlighting the importance of incorporating distinct types of interactions of interacting systems. Flower–animal interactions encompass a continuum of mutualistic to antagonistic behaviors. Although the importance of pollinators in interaction networks has been widely reported, the role of floral antagonists remains overlooked. In Collaea cipoensis, an endemic shrub from southeastern Brazil, we modeled an individual‐based network assessing the flower visitors' functional behavior and tested if plant centrality increases fitness. Centrality indicates how well‐connected a given plant is with the rest of the conspecifics through shared flower visitors. Specifically, we tested if flower visitor interactions are amplified by many‐flowered individuals, and whether the relationship between centrality and plant fitness encompasses the effects of mutualists or antagonists. Subsequently, we quantified each visiting species' effectiveness. Antagonistic interactions were the most frequent in the network (97% of visits), primarily conducted by the nectar‐robbing bee Trigona spinipes (66%), which was also the most central species and detrimental antagonist. The hummingbirds Colibri serrirostris and Eupatomena macroura were the most efficient pollinators, with a high contribution to the quantity—floral visitation—and the quality—viable seeds—components, respectively. Many‐flowered plants showed greater centrality, which boosted the plant's cohesion in the network and increased flower visitation. Accordingly, many‐flowered plants were better connected, mainly due to antagonistic visitors. Thus, centrality increases were not positively translated into more reproductive success. Our results reinforce the dynamic scenarios of flower–animal interactions, with consequences to plant reproductive ecology. We highlight the importance of incorporating distinct types of interactions to unveil the complexity of interacting systems, that when not explored, hide potential evolutionary consequences for plant reproductive success. in Portuguese is available with online material. Resumo As interações entre as plantas e seus visitantes florais englobam um continuo de comportamentos que variam desde mutualísticos até antagônicos. Embora a importância dos polinizadores tem sido amplamente estudada nas redes de interação, o papel dos antagonistas florais ainda é negligenciado. Usando o arbusto endêmico do Brasil Collaea cipoensis, modelamos uma rede de interações baseada em indivíduos para avaliar o comportamento funcional dos visitantes florais, e testamos se a centralidade aumenta o sucesso reprodutivo. A centralidade indica o quão bem conectado um indivíduo está com outros coespecíficos através do compartilhamento de visitantes florais. Especificamente, testamos se as interações flor‐visitante são amplificadas em indivíduos com maior número de flores e se a relação entre centralidade e sucesso reprodutivo da planta compreende os efeitos simultâneos de mutualistas ou antagonistas. Posteriormente, quantificamos a eficácia de cada visitante. Os antagonistas florais foram os mais frequentes (97% das visitas), sendo a abelha Trigona spinipes (66%) a espécie mais central e prejudicial na rede de interações. Os beija‐flores Colibri serrirostris e Eupatomena macroura foram os polinizadores mais eficientes, com alta contribuição nos componentes de quantidade ‐visitação floral‐ e qualidade ‐sementes viáveis‐, respectivamente. Plantas com muitas flores apresentaram maior centralidade, o que impulsionou a conexão da planta na rede e aumentou a visitação floral. Consequentemente, plantas com muitas flores estavam melhor conectadas, principalmente devido às visitas de antagonistas. Assim, aumentos na centralidade não representaram um maior sucesso reprodutivo. Nossos resultados reforçam os cenários dinâmicos das interações flor‐visitante, com consequências para a ecologia reprodutiva das plantas. Destacamos a importância de incorporar diferentes tipos de interações para elucidar a complexidade dos sistemas naturais, que quando não explorados, escondem potenciais consequências evolutivas para a reprodução das plantas.

Ornithophilous canopy species in the Atlantic rain forest of southeastern Brazil

Pollination syndromes ignored: importance of non-ornithophilous flowers to Neotropical savanna hummingbirds

Plant–hummingbird interaction networks in an urban area: a generalist species as the protagonist in mutualistic and agonistic interactions

Pollination in the Desert: Adaptation to Bees and Birds in Salvia rhombifolia

Changing the main course: strong bat visitation to the ornithophilous mistletoe Psittacanthus robustus (Loranthaceae) in a Neotropical savanna

Flower visitors of Aechmea nudicaulis (Bromeliaceae): species richness, visitation frequency, and interactions in different habitats of southern Brazil

Edible Fruit Plant Species in the Amazon Forest Rely Mostly on Bees and Beetles as Pollinators

Exotic and native plants play equally important roles in supporting and structuring plant-hummingbird networks within urban green spaces

Flower visitor networks: Reduced reproductive success driven by antagonists in a hummingbird‐pollinated species

A Cross Biome Synthesis on Pollination Systems in a Megadiverse Tropical Country

Epizoochory in Parrots as an Overlooked Yet Widespread Plant–Animal Mutualism

Prestoea palm flower visitors and potential pollinators in the Andean–Amazonian Piedmont Forest of Ecuador

Nectar robbing effects on pollinators of a key nectar source plant (Tecoma fulva, Bignoniaceae) in a dry tropical Andean valley

Nectar production dynamics and daily pattern of pollinator visits in Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa Bonpl.) plantations in Central Amazon: implications for fruit production

Showy birds on attractive food sources: rainbow lorikeets and their plant-related functions at a residential area in South-eastern Australia

Untangling biodiversity interactions: A meta network on pollination in Earth's most diverse tropical savanna

AVIFAUNA IN TWO REMNANTS OF BREJOS DE ALTITUDE IN THE STATE OF PERNAMBUCO, BRAZIL

An unexpected case of wind pollination: ambophily in an ornithophilous tropical mountaintop Orobanchaceae

How do birds and ants contribute to the recruitment of a tropical tree?

Diet and bird-plant interaction networks based on citizen science data in Lima, Peru: exotic and native species are important

Habitat differences in seed‐dispersing vertebrates indicate dispersal limitation in tropical bracken‐dominated deforested areas