Abstract:The ability of a host plant to act as a substrate or media for larval development may depend on how good it is at offering suitable nutrients for bacterial growth. In this study, we hypothesized that the suitability of a fruit type for fruit fly larval development is positively correlated with the ability of that fruit to act as a substrate/media for fruit fly symbiotic bacterial growth. We allowed a single female fruit fly to lay eggs on five different host fruits, then we monitored the larval development parameters across five generations and analyzed the bacterial community structure of larvae developing in 2 of these hosts (apple and banana) at the first and fifth generations. Results indicate that the larval length and dry weight did not vary significantly across experimental generations, but were greatly affected by fruit types and larval stages. The larval development time was extended considerably in apple and tomato but shortened in banana and mango. There was a significant shift in bacterial community structure and composition across fruits and generations. The bacterial community of larvae within the same fruit (apple and banana) clustered and was similar to the parental female (with the predominance of Proteobacteria), but there was a shift at the fifth generation (dominance of Firmicutes). Banana offered a suitable better development and growth to larvae and bacteria, respectively, compared to apple in which reduced larval development and bacterial growth were recorded. Although additional experiments are needed to adequately show that the differences in microbiome seen in fruit fly larval guts are the actual driver of different developmental outcomes of larvae on the different fruits, at the very least, our study has provided intriguing data suggesting interaction between the diets and gut microbial communities on insect development.Importance and Significance of the study Tephritid fruit flies entertain complex interactions with gut bacteria. These bacteria are known to provide nutritional benefits to their hosts, by supplementing missing nutrients from the host diets and regulating energy balance. Foraging for food is a risky exercise for the insect which is exposed to ecological adversities, including predators. Therefore, making beneficial choice among available food substrates is a question of survival for the flies and bacteria as well. Our study demonstrates interactions between the host fly and its intestinal bacteria in sustaining the larval development while foraging optimally on different fruit types. These findings add a novel step into our understanding of the interactions between the gut microbial communities and B. dorsalis and provide avenues for developing control strategies to limit the devastative incidence of the fly.

Mutualism promotes insect fitness by fungal nutrient compensation and facilitates fungus propagation by mediating insect oviposition preference

Behavioural response of the fungus gnat, <i>Bradysia impatiens</i> (Diptera: Sciaridae) towards certain edible mushrooms and saprophytic fungi

Fusarium phytopathogens as insect mutualists

Yeast Mediates the Interspecific Interaction Between Introduced Bactrocera Dorsalis and Indigenous Bactrocera Minax

Fungal infestation boosts fruit aroma and fruit removal by mammals and birds

Research progress on the bacterial and fungal symbionts in fruit flies(Diptera: Tephritidae)

New Insights into the Biological Interaction Between Unripe Citrus Fruits and the Tephritid Fly Bactrocera Minax Based on Omics

Diverse Bacterial Symbionts of Insect-Pathogentic Fungi and Possible Impact on the Maintenance of Virulence During Infection

Bringing back the fruit into fruit fly–bacteria interactions

An iron-binding protein of entomopathogenic fungus suppresses the proliferation of host symbiotic bacteria

Empirical Support for the Pattern of Competitive Exclusion between Insect Parasitic Fungi

An at-leg pellet and associated Penicillium sp. provide multiple protections to mealybugs

The symbiont Acinetobacter baumannii enhances the insect host resistance to entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae

Symbiotic Bacteria Motivate the Foraging Decision and Promote Fecundity and Survival of Bactrocera Dorsalis (diptera: Tephritidae)

Effect of Gut Bacteria on Fitness of the Chinese Citrus Fly, Bactrocera Minax (diptera: Tephritidae)

Host fruits shape the changes in the gut microbiota and development of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) larvae

Gut bacteria induce oviposition preference through ovipositor recognition in fruit fly

Friend or Foe: Symbiotic Bacteria in Bactrocera dorsalis–Parasitoid Associations

Host Fruit As a Suitable Bacteria Growth Substrate That Promotes Larval Development of Bactrocera Dorsalis (diptera: Tephritidae)

Red-light is an environmental effector for mutualism between begomovirus and its vector whitefly

Fire Ants Mediate Competition Between Scale Insects and Fruit Flies