Effects of inequality on a spatial evolutionary public goods game

Jinzhuo Liu,Mao Peng,Yunchen Peng,Yong Li,Chen Chu,Xiaoyu Li,Qing Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00177-w
2021-08-01
The European Physical Journal B
Abstract:<span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec1"><p class="a-plus-plus">Over the past decade, inequality has become one of the most complex and troubling challenges in the global economy. Many scientists are determined to eliminate inequality to achieve full cooperation. However, our research shows that not all inequalities hinder cooperation. In this article, we study the effects of inequality by introducing the disassortative mixing of the investment amount and enhancement factor assigned to certain individuals in the public goods game. Compared with the traditional version, we find that cooperation can be effectively promoted by aligned inequality, which means that individuals with the highest (lowest) investment capabilities contribute the greatest (lowest) investment amounts. The promotion of cooperation mainly depends on the heterogeneous contribution ability of players. Specifically, cooperators with high contribution ability can maximize collective benefits, causing cooperators with low contribution ability to form compact clusters and resist invasion by defectors. Our research indicates that the diversity of individual endowment and productivity may have a non-negligible influence on the evolution of cooperation among selfish individuals.</p></span><span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec2 outputmedium-online"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Graphic </h3><p class="a-plus-plus">The frequency of cooperation <span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq1"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.146ex" height="2.176ex" style="vertical-align: -0.838ex;" viewBox="0 -576.1 924 936.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-3C1" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMATHI-63" x="731" y="-213"></use></g></svg></span></span></span> as a function of the enhancement factor <em class="a-plus-plus">r</em> for different correlation coefficients. </p></span><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;"><defs id="MathJax_SVG_glyphs"><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-3C1" d="M58 -216Q25 -216 23 -186Q23 -176 73 26T127 234Q143 289 182 341Q252 427 341 441Q343 441 349 441T359 442Q432 442 471 394T510 276Q510 219 486 165T425 74T345 13T266 -10H255H248Q197 -10 165 35L160 41L133 -71Q108 -168 104 -181T92 -202Q76 -216 58 -216ZM424 322Q424 359 407 382T357 405Q322 405 287 376T231 300Q217 269 193 170L176 102Q193 26 260 26Q298 26 334 62Q367 92 389 158T418 266T424 322Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-63" d="M34 159Q34 268 120 355T306 442Q362 442 394 418T427 355Q427 326 408 306T360 285Q341 285 330 295T319 325T330 359T352 380T366 386H367Q367 388 361 392T340 400T306 404Q276 404 249 390Q228 381 206 359Q162 315 142 235T121 119Q121 73 147 50Q169 26 205 26H209Q321 26 394 111Q403 121 406 121Q410 121 419 112T429 98T420 83T391 55T346 25T282 0T202 -11Q127 -11 81 37T34 159Z"></path></defs></svg>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?